Hi
I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a if
(boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
imply several layers (filter, appender, handler, logger...) for nothing and
slow down cachi
On 1 June 2014 20:26, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
> 1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a if
> (boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
> imply several layers (filter, a
There is also log4j 2.
Gary
Original message From: Romain Manni-Bucau
Date:06/01/2014 15:26 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [jcs] logging
Hi
I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache
would be JUL (where
loghelper is needed) or another dependency...
Le 2 juin 2014 00:01, "Gary Gregory" a écrit :
> There is also log4j 2.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Date:06/01/2014 15:26 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons D
Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
> 1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a
> if (boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
> imply several layers (filter, appender, handler, log
Well because [logging] was longly broken in a not flat classloading
environment (didnt check last release but almost all logging facade got
this issue at a point) and because almost nothing in TomEE stacks uses it,
it is not as integrated as log4j, slf4j or JUL (which is the default). Main
issue I
Gregory" a écrit :
>
> > There is also log4j 2.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > Original message From: Romain
> Manni-Bucau
> > Date:06/01/2014 15:26 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [jcs] logging
>
h would be a regression IMHO + either would be JUL (where
> > loghelper is needed) or another dependency...
> > Le 2 juin 2014 00:01, "Gary Gregory" a écrit :
> >
> > > There is also log4j 2.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > Origina
h would be a regression IMHO + either would be JUL (where
> > loghelper is needed) or another dependency...
> > Le 2 juin 2014 00:01, "Gary Gregory" a écrit :
> >
> > > There is also log4j 2.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
e a log4j 2 Jira for this? There might be one
> already though. I have seen discussions about this area on the log4j dev ML.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Date:06/02/2014 08:31 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
>
On 6/1/14, 12:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
> 1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a if
> (boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
> imply several layers (filter, app
actually these logs are really debug log not intended to be activated in
prod excepted if there is a big issue (@thomas: if you can confirm it would
be great).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github:
On 02.06.14 17:02, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> actually these logs are really debug log not intended to be activated in
> prod excepted if there is a big issue (@thomas: if you can confirm it would
> be great).
Yes, logging is for debugging purposes mostly. But if you remove them:
how would you do
On 01.06.14 21:26, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
> 1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a if
> (boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
> imply several layers (filter, appe
@Thomas: never said [logging] is bad and JUL is better. Sorry if I was not
clear. All logging facades don't handle very well EE case for several good
or bad reasons. [logging] is as good as slf4j for it (even better out of
the box IIRC). JUL is far to be perfect but is in the JVM (so no
dependency)
Send from my mobile device
> Am 02.06.2014 um 21:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> @Thomas: never said [logging] is bad and JUL is better. Sorry if I was not
> clear. All logging facades don't handle very well EE case for several good
> or bad reasons. [logging] is as good as slf4j for it (ev
16 matches
Mail list logo
