Hello.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:34:52 -0400, Evan and Maureen Ward wrote:
Hi Gilles, Luc,
Thanks for all the comments. I'll try to respond to the more
fundamental
concerns in this email, and the more practical ones in another email,
if we
decide that we want to include data editing in [math].
Hi Gilles, Luc,
Thanks for all the comments. I'll try to respond to the more fundamental
concerns in this email, and the more practical ones in another email, if we
decide that we want to include data editing in [math].
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2
Hi.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:16:07 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 12/09/2014 01:35, Gilles a écrit :
Hello.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:29:49 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi,
A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing
(aka data
editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our
Le 12/09/2014 01:35, Gilles a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:29:49 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing (aka data
>> editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our non-linear least
>> squares implementations.[1] As
Hello.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:29:49 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi,
A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing (aka
data
editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our non-linear
least
squares implementations.[1] As the name suggests, the idea is to
de-weight
observat
Hi,
A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing (aka data
editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our non-linear least
squares implementations.[1] As the name suggests, the idea is to de-weight
observations that don't match the user's model. There are several ways to
