xfer to dev distro =)
> On Nov 5, 2010, at 10:23 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The challenge with making a smart pool implementation is that it is hard
> to
> >> define an algorithm that "does no harm" (i.e. always actually impro
Hi Steven,
this feature sounds *cool*!!! +1 for me, definitively!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Not Paul, Phil. My bad!
>
> S
>
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Steven Siebert wrote:
>
>> First, Paul, nice pr
Not Paul, Phil. My bad!
S
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Steven Siebert wrote:
First, Paul, nice presentation at ApacheCon =)
I came up after the discussion to mention a feature I added to my
pool implementation, wanted to record this here and get community
thoughts.
What I have done for
First, Paul, nice presentation at ApacheCon =)
I came up after the discussion to mention a feature I added to my pool
implementation, wanted to record this here and get community thoughts.
What I have done for a customer (non-releasable, but I can re-implement much
cleaner) was essentially enable