Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On 18 February 2018 at 14:03, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 13:50:26 +, sebb wrote: >> >> On 18 February 2018 at 13:46, Thomas Vandahl wrote: >>> >>> On 18.02.18 14:20, Rob Tompkins wrote: Not quite because our release process

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 13:50:26 +, sebb wrote: On 18 February 2018 at 13:46, Thomas Vandahl wrote: On 18.02.18 14:20, Rob Tompkins wrote: Not quite because our release process isn’t precisely the same as what maven does. Hence, our release plugin strives to be a shim for

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 14:46:03 +0100, Thomas Vandahl wrote: On 18.02.18 14:20, Rob Tompkins wrote: Not quite because our release process isn’t precisely the same as what maven does. Hence, our release plugin strives to be a shim for our site and distribution files. But yes, I agree that “mvn

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On 18 February 2018 at 13:46, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 18.02.18 14:20, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Not quite because our release process isn’t precisely the same as what maven >> does. Hence, our release plugin strives to be a shim for our site and >> distribution files. But yes,

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On 18.02.18 14:20, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Not quite because our release process isn’t precisely the same as what maven > does. Hence, our release plugin strives to be a shim for our site and > distribution files. But yes, I agree that “mvn deploy” should essentially do > everything you need.

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 18, 2018, at 5:11 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > >> On 07.02.18 00:28, Gilles wrote: >> Having no idea on how to achieve it, I'd wish that creating >> the "full dist" only requires a custom "goal" like (?) >> $ mvn package:dist >> with no ad-hoc directory/module: all

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On 07.02.18 00:28, Gilles wrote: > Having no idea on how to achieve it, I'd wish that creating > the "full dist" only requires a custom "goal" like (?) >  $ mvn package:dist > with no ad-hoc directory/module: all modules specified in the > top POM would have their artefacts (recursively) bundled

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:33:19 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:17:29 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:16 AM,

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:17:29 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Gilles

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:17:29 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:05:15 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:47 AM,

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 16, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Rob Tompkins > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Gilles >>

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Gilles wrote: >> >> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:05:15 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:47 AM, Gilles

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 16, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Gilles wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:05:15 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:47 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:01:23 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: > On Feb

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:05:15 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:47 AM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:01:23 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 15, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:22:59

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:47 AM, Gilles wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:01:23 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Feb 15, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:22:59 +0100, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 7 Feb

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:01:23 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 15, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:22:59 +0100, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:31:45 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 15, 2018, at 3:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Another goal (for me at least) is to put the plugin in commons-parent such > each Commons Component does not need to define it, only refer to it. > +1 > Gary > >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

Another goal (for me at least) is to put the plugin in commons-parent such each Commons Component does not need to define it, only refer to it. Gary On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Feb 15, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Gilles

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 15, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Gilles wrote: > >> On Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:22:59 +0100, Gilles wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:31:45 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:22:59 +0100, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:31:45 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:49:52 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:31:45 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:49:52 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500,

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:49:52 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: > On Feb 5,

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:49:52 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500,

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: Which should

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have subtle differences that lead to different

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

> On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have >> subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build. > > Which differences

Re: [release-plugin] best multi-module project?

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build. Which differences did you spot? Gilles I figure we pick one and make that the standard multi-module build

[release-plugin] best multi-module project?

Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build. I figure we pick one and make that the standard multi-module build paradigm and fit the others into it. -Rob