Re: [rng][geometry][statistics][numbers] Updating Checkstyle rules

2019-05-21 Thread Alex Herbert
> On 21 May 2019, at 23:52, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Thanks for the CheckStyle update. > > I'd say that we enforce it for the "main" parts of the repositories and > be lenient for the existing unit tests (but try to follow convention for > new tests). There is the option to add an

Re: [rng][geometry][statistics][numbers] Updating Checkstyle rules

2019-05-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Thanks for the CheckStyle update. I'd say that we enforce it for the "main" parts of the repositories and be lenient for the existing unit tests (but try to follow convention for new tests). Regards, Gilles Le mar. 21 mai 2019 à 17:23, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On 21/05/2019 12:47, Alex

Re: [rng][geometry][statistics][numbers] Updating Checkstyle rules

2019-05-21 Thread Alex Herbert
On 21/05/2019 12:47, Alex Herbert wrote: The checkstyle file for all these projects has a common origin (of [math]?). Checkstyle has advanced since the origin of these checks and there are many more checks that can be added to maintain the current coding style. I've looked at this for RNG

[rng][geometry][statistics][numbers] Updating Checkstyle rules

2019-05-21 Thread Alex Herbert
The checkstyle file for all these projects has a common origin (of [math]?). Checkstyle has advanced since the origin of these checks and there are many more checks that can be added to maintain the current coding style. I've looked at this for RNG starting from a template for the Sun