Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-
To
2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com:
2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
Just a note FWIW. Spring WebFlow also uses OGNL.
So, OGNL as a
To be a TLP, you need a bare minimum of 3 active committers,
preferably 6. And you'd need to go via the incubator. Commons is an
easier fit as the committers can be shared with other commons
components, but that still depends on existing commons committers
saying that they'd be willing to help
I'm interested and would be more than glad on helping OGNL to join the
Incubator, count on me to prepare the proposal.
I know that this topic should maybe be discussed elsewhere, but before
putting an end to this thread I'd like to ask who's interested,
between Commons devs, on joining? Looks like
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Looks like Antonio is interested and
it would be very nice if he joins.
In fact I am, Tiles also uses OGNL via a separate module.
Once I created a proposal for a subproject for Tiles but it failed:
2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com:
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Looks like Antonio is interested and
it would be very nice if he joins.
In fact I am
If it was not clear, I wish to join :-)
Antonio
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Anyone more? :)
You can count on me, but I'm a Struts Committer.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-
To
2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Anyone more? :)
You can count on me, but I'm a Struts Committer.
I know it :-) for incubation, being an Apache commiter is a plus when
creating an incubation proposal.
I think you should ask
Thanks, it was :) I'm already on general@, I'll move the discussion there :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com:
2011/3/3
One more :-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List d
://confitura.pl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List d...@struts.apache.org,
lukasz.len...@gmail.com
Lukasz,
you can count on me too, feel free to tell
...@googlemail.comwrote:
One more :-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts
:-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List d...@struts.apache.org, lukasz.len...@gmail.com
DW: Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com
It seems like it might be a good
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List d...@struts.apache.org
Count me in for backup. If someone gets tied up with day work and you need
an extra hand, I will help take
On 3/3/11 6:06 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Thanks, it was :) I'm already on general@, I'll move the discussion there :)
Simo
It looks to me like if what you guys want to do is incubate OGNL for
eventual home in Commons, you have the support you need. The
non-Commons ASF committers interested can
That's an incredible idea Phil, thanks for your kind feedback!
I already started preparing the proposal[1] and sill looking for
Sponsor/Champions/Mentors, I like the idea of OGNL as Commons
Component and we're waiting for feedbacks from Apache Struts, maybe
they're interested too, the we will have
On 3/3/11 9:24 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
That's an incredible idea Phil, thanks for your kind feedback!
I already started preparing the proposal[1] and sill looking for
Sponsor/Champions/Mentors, I like the idea of OGNL as Commons
Component and we're waiting for feedbacks from Apache Struts,
Hi,
So, where I should start ?
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi all guys,
I personally like the proposal and think that OGNL is a nice piece of
software that Commons could only benefit if it will join.
As I previously expressed, IMHO OGNL could be merged to BeanUtils that
already supports the same features, but in a less sophisticated way;
BeanUtils could
2010/12/13 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
) into Commons project?
Personally I would like to see it as a TLP.
AFAIK Apache foundation likes to see one
2011/3/1 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com:
2010/12/13 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
) into Commons project?
Personally I would like to see it
2011/3/1 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com:
There is another problem: is OpenSymphony willing to donate the code to
Apache?
It's not only a problem of forking, because the entire copyright
will pass to Apache, at least for the donated code as it is (the
copyright will remain to
From Commons HP[1] The Commons is an Apache project focused on all
aspects of reusable Java components here we use to speak about Math,
Digester, BeanUtils, ... as components and not projects, there are no
exceptions you mentioned.
Moreover, since EL[2] and JXPATH[3] found their home here at
in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-as-a-part-of-Commons-tp3085026p3330241.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
rather than overlapping ones.
Thoughts ?
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-as-a-part-of-Commons-tp3085026p3330241.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in
the
future rather than overlapping ones.
Thoughts ?
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-as-a-part-of-Commons-tp3085026p3330241.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
than overlapping ones.
Thoughts ?
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-as-a-part-of-Commons-tp3085026p3330241.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
2011/3/1 Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@joda.org:
Based on what I know of OGNL, it is/was reasonably well used. Trying
to merge it into another project doesn't help those existing users.
Yep, that's true
The question is what are the author(s) of OGNL looking for? A home for
maintainance? The
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Based on what I know of OGNL, it is/was reasonably well used. Trying
to merge it into another project doesn't help those existing users.
The question is what are the author(s) of OGNL looking for? A home for
maintainance? The Apache brand? To reinvigorate it? The
Hi all guys,
just a small idea about it: BeanUtils is already maintaining something
similar[1] to OGNL, that BTW is more sophisticated, so I propose to
evaluate OGNL be accepted as part of BeanUtils, it should be a very
good contribution that would improve the commons component.
WDYT?
Simo
[1]
Hi Lukasz,
Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hi all,
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
) into Commons project?
What happened to OpenSymphony that you cannot use their infrastructure
anymore?
- Jörg
2010/12/15 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com:
What happened to OpenSymphony that you cannot use their infrastructure
anymore?
I don't know, there was some rumor about domain owners or so. Also
other projects were moved out from OpenSymphony: WebWork became Struts
2, XWork was moved to
On 14 December 2010 06:38, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/12/13 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features
like calling statics or using constructors. It's used internally by
Struts 2 to evaluate user expressions and not
2010/12/14 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
So does it offer anything that JEXL does not?
I think no, it looks like JEXL2 is even much better than OGNL. I don't
know JEXL2 so deep, but with OGNL you can create objects directly (o
= new Object()) and you can call methods with parameters
(foo.doit(o)).
+1.
Just like to point out that duplication of featureset is not an issue
in Commons.
Hen
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Lukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl ,
[mailto:lukasz.len...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 02:39
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: OGNL as a part of Commons
Hi all,
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
) into Commons project?
As I
2010/12/13 Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com:
I am wondering how OGNL relates to Commons JXPath
http://commons.apache.org/jxpath/
When would you use one vs. the other?
OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features
like calling statics or using constructors. It's
On 13 December 2010 20:57, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/12/13 Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com:
I am wondering how OGNL relates to Commons JXPath
http://commons.apache.org/jxpath/
When would you use one vs. the other?
OGNL is an Expression Language like
2010/12/13 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features
like calling statics or using constructors. It's used internally by
Struts 2 to evaluate user expressions and not only in JSP but in any
other place.
In which case it seems to be similar to
Hi all,
I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
(https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
) into Commons project?
As I know OGNL is used by few ASF projects (Struts 2, Tapestry) and
right now it's homeless project. It's very hard to prepare a new
41 matches
Mail list logo
