Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Mark,
Mark Struberg wrote:
folks, please keep on voting.
There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
Well, this is exactly the point what we want to avoid. The beta release is
there for giving
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Mark,
Mark Struberg wrote:
folks, please keep on voting.
There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
Well, this is exactly the
maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
I have no problems
dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
To: bval
1:14:50 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
Hi Mark,
Mark Struberg wrote:
folks, please keep on voting.
There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be
named as long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
Well, this is exactly the point what we want to avoid. The beta release is
there for giving users an impression about the
