[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-11-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

2009-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit contains errors. The current state of this

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

2009-11-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Dan Fabulich a écrit : This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. For RC3 I fixed the CheckStyle and FindBugs errors, except for the bad practice bug of using getClass().getResourceAsStream(), which would probably require an API change. Thanks for taking care of these

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

2009-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme contains errors. The current state of this

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

2009-11-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1 again Dan Fabulich wrote: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. For RC3 I fixed the CheckStyle and FindBugs errors, except for the bad practice bug of using getClass().getResourceAsStream(), which would probably require an API change. As noted in earlier

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

2009-11-08 Thread Julien Aymé
+1 as before. Thanks a lot for doing all this. Julien 2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. For RC3 I fixed the CheckStyle and FindBugs errors, except for the bad practice bug of using getClass().getResourceAsStream(), which

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

2009-11-08 Thread Oliver Heger
I tried to build the sources on a JDK 1.5 and got the following errors: D:\data\projects\OpenSource\dbutils\commons-dbutils-1.3-src\src\java\org\apache\ commons\dbutils\wrappers\SqlNullCheckedResultSet.java:[216,53] cannot find symbol symbol : method copyOf(byte[],int) location: class

[VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

2009-11-08 Thread Dan Fabulich
This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm still only 99% sure of this; clirr

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

2009-11-08 Thread Dan Fabulich
D'oh! Good catch... Oliver Heger wrote: I tried to build the sources on a JDK 1.5 and got the following errors: D:\data\projects\OpenSource\dbutils\commons-dbutils-1.3-src\src\java\org\apache\ commons\dbutils\wrappers\SqlNullCheckedResultSet.java:[216,53] cannot find symbol symbol :

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

2009-11-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1 Dan Fabulich wrote: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm still

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

2009-11-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Dan Fabulich a écrit : This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. There is a new (very minor) checkstyle error in this version. This is not blocking. +1 Luc

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

2009-11-08 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Dan Fabulich schrieb: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

2009-11-08 Thread Julien Aymé
+1 Julien 2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible

RE: [vfs] JDK 1.5

2009-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should still have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. If it is just me, I'd be happy to drop 1.4 dependency - Past votes were declined. Probably

RE: [vfs] JDK 1.5

2009-11-08 Thread Gary Gregory
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 22:24 To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [vfs] JDK 1.5 Guys, looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 I am questionning

Re: [vfs] JDK 1.5

2009-11-08 Thread Ralph Goers
On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Guys, looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should still have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. VFS 2.0 will be a major release and JDK