+1
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Julien
2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com:
This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs.
In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing
FindBugs
errors; in RC4
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit contains errors.
The current state of this
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme contains errors.
The current state of this
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
Phil Steitz wrote:
OK, I am now feeling stupid.
You and me both.
GKOP already has LRU-cache like
behavior. (See clearOldest test in allocate()). Given compat
issues, I am inclined to move forward with 0).
+1
We'll also need pool 1.5.4 as well to fix an edge case where the pool
could lock
One of the bugs (BEANUTILS-345) fixed in BeanUtils 1.8.1 has resulted
in a new bug (BEANUTILS-368) so I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.2 to
fix this problem.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
[ ] -1 No, because...
BeanUtils 1.8.2 RC1 is available for review here:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a
year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1
[X] +1 Yes go
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 23:34
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [vfs] JDK 1.5
On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Guys,
looking at Ralph's comment in
+1 Looks good!
Oliver
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
One of the bugs (BEANUTILS-345) fixed in BeanUtils 1.8.1 has resulted
in a new bug (BEANUTILS-368) so I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.2 to
fix this problem.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
[ ] -1 No, because...
BeanUtils 1.8.2 RC1
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils
Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
OK, I am now feeling stupid.
You and me both.
GKOP already has LRU-cache like
behavior. (See clearOldest test in allocate()). Given compat
issues, I am inclined to move forward with 0).
+1
We'll also need pool 1.5.4 as well to fix an edge case
Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
OK, I am now feeling stupid.
You and me both.
GKOP already has LRU-cache like
behavior. (See clearOldest test in allocate()). Given compat
issues, I am inclined to move forward with 0).
+1
We'll also need pool 1.5.4 as well to fix an edge case
+1
Phil
Niall Pemberton wrote:
One of the bugs (BEANUTILS-345) fixed in BeanUtils 1.8.1 has resulted
in a new bug (BEANUTILS-368) so I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.2 to
fix this problem.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
[ ] -1 No, because...
BeanUtils 1.8.2 RC1 is
14 matches
Mail list logo
