Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:20 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Switching to origin/release-3.2.1 lets me run the default Maven goal (just > 'mvn') to successfully to completion! > May I kindly ask for the debug log again? I'd like to know whether JCS can find a valid multicast interface

Re: (commons-jcs) 03/03: Skip multicast tests when no multicast interface is available

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 19:35 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > This is where you want to use JUnit assumptions so you get visibility for > skipped tests. > Yes, I know. However, that does not work with the old JUnit3-style tests. I will fix this in the master branch where all tests already have

Re: (commons-jcs) 03/03: Skip multicast tests when no multicast interface is available

2024-04-06 Thread Gary Gregory
This is where you want to use JUnit assumptions so you get visibility for skipped tests. Gary On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, 12:54 PM wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > tv pushed a commit to branch release-3.2.1 > in repository

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Probably a job for JUnit assumptions. Gary On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, 12:17 PM Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Hi Gary, > > > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:48 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > > > And to confirm that VPN is the issue, I reconnected and got: > > > > [ERROR] Failures: > > [ERROR]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:48 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > And to confirm that VPN is the issue, I reconnected and got: > > [ERROR] Failures: > [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testPassiveBroadcast:116 > message not received > [ERROR]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Gary D. Gregory
And to confirm that VPN is the issue, I reconnected and got: [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testPassiveBroadcast:116 message not received [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testRemoveBroadcast:138 message not received [ERROR]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:20 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Ah, I was on git master on Windows, which without the VPN, now hangs in: > > [INFO] Running > org.apache.commons.jcs3.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheConcurrentNoDeadLockUnitTest > Thou shalt not run the whole test suite

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Gary D. Gregory
Ah, I was on git master on Windows, which without the VPN, now hangs in: [INFO] Running org.apache.commons.jcs3.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheConcurrentNoDeadLockUnitTest Switching to origin/release-3.2.1 lets me run the default Maven goal (just 'mvn') to successfully to completion!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 15:07 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > > which failed with the log here: https://paste.apache.org/b4p09 Please check out from branch release-3.2.1 and try again. Bye, Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 15:07 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > > which failed with the log here: https://paste.apache.org/b4p09 Thanks for helping me to tackle this. I see that the network interface used for the test is a "Cisco

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread sebb
Another minor issue: If you run 'mvn test' without first doing 'mvn clean', it fails with: [ERROR] JDBCDiskCacheUnitTest.testInitializePoolAccess_withPoolName:157 » SQL Table already exists: JCSTESTTABLE_INITIALIZEPOOLACCESS in statement [CREATE CACHED TABLE JCSTESTTABLE_InitializePoolAccess]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Gary D. Gregory
Thomas, Running 'mvn clean verify -pl commons-jcs3-core' fails as usual (git master). The class UDPDiscoverySenderUnitTest is _excluded_ in the POM so it does not even run. I edited logging.properties: handlers=java.util.logging.FileHandler .level = FINER

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 14:10 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Hi Thomas, > > I ran: > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderUnitTest -X >\test\out.txt > > and killed it after 10 minutes since it never finished. I tried 3 times. Thanks. Not good. Could you please repeat the test with the log

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Gary D. Gregory
Hi Thomas, I ran: mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderUnitTest -X >\test\out.txt and killed it after 10 minutes since it never finished. I tried 3 times. See https://paste.apache.org/0d08b TY, Gary On 2024/04/06 10:02:36 Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Hi Gary, > > > Am 05.04.2024 um 17:28 schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Gary, > Am 05.04.2024 um 17:28 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > [INFO] Running > org.apache.commons.jcs3.utils.discovery.UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > [ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 9.526 > s <<< FAILURE! - in >

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
I am cancelling the vote because of strange test failures in some environments. Bye, Thomas > Am 04.04.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi folks, > Am 05.04.2024 um 23:26 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Wow, that's the first macOS failure for this type of issue. Bruno and I > both see this on Windows. Ok, let's try to fix this. Could you please run the affected test only with debug log and provide the log files to me? I'll cancel