://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding obviously): OS X, Fed14.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution
+1 (non-binding obviously): OS X, Fed14.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/
Maven artifacts are
On Mar 24, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/03/2011 20:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/03/2011 19:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/23/11 12:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil,
I believe all the pool issues for 1.5.x have been resolved. Over to
you... :)
Thanks! You are awesome, Mark!
On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote:
Dear all,
Regarding
1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management
Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC)
On Sep 5, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The distribution zips/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/
Maven artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/maven/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/docs/
On Dec 30, 2009, at 6:31 AM, sebb wrote:
The 1.3 code builds and tests OK with Java 1.4.2 and 1.5.0, but
generates a lot of stack traces from TestManual.testLogWriter().
Ideally the output should be suppressed.
However, compilation fails when using Java 1.6.0. Unfortunately the POM says:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all
interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will
kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple
of days. I see these
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
We have found and fixed another pool 1.5 regression (POOL-152) and
we would like to cut a patch release including the fix.
Release distributions:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.4-RC1/
Maven artifacts:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+private static final String [] try_envs = {
+TMP,
+TEMP,
+TMPDIR,
+TEMPDIR
+};
Not sure about that ordering, unless we want to favor Windows
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 22/09/09 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+ private static final String [] try_envs = {
+ TMP,
+ TEMP,
+ TMPDIR,
+ TEMPDIR
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 22/09/09 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+ private static final String
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 22/09/09 18:05, Jim Jagielski wrote:
# First, try the environment.
for envname in 'TMPDIR', 'TEMP', 'TMP':
OK. You've convinced me :)
*grin* :)
Cheers
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
+private static final String [] try_envs = {
+TMP,
+TEMP,
+TMPDIR,
+TEMPDIR
+};
Not sure about that ordering, unless we want to favor Windows.
For Unix the canonical envvar is TMPDIR, so it should
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1.
Keys good.
Sigs good.
Manifest looks good on jar.
Javadoc has correct version.
NOTICE good.
LICENSE good.
RELEASE NOTES good (matches JIRA).
Source unpacks happily and builds a jar
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1.
Keys good.
Sigs good.
Manifest looks good on jar.
Javadoc has correct version.
NOTICE good.
LICENSE good.
RELEASE NOTES good (matches JIRA).
Source unpacks happily and builds a jar without problem.
Confirmed the above... Plus:
init:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
POOL-149 impacts Grails badly. The Grails project is aiming to
release
Grails 1.2 soon and they need a 1.5.3 release or they'll have to drop
back to 1.4.x
I'd really like to see Grails using pool 1.5.x as it offers a good
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people
to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of
course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage
message they also get
Trying to duplicate...
On Jun 2, 2009, at 3:03 PM, sebb wrote:
I've been running the GKOP and GOP tests repeatedly, and there are
some tests which still fail now and then:
The following test fails regularly:
testThreaded1(org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPool)
Time elapsed: 6
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] j...@jagunet.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Great is the guilt
On May 28, 2009, at 4:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 28/05/2009, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I created CODEC-75 (url-safe Base64) and attached a 20KB patch to the
ticket. Anyone interested in committing this?
The patch improves codec's base64 handling in two ways:
1. Ability
+1. The release was/is fine :)
On May 21, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Thanks Rainer.
I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything
works then.
I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just
a broker link... right guys?
Thanks
On May 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
I have finished working my way through the open POOL bugs.
Of the remaining issues, 2 are bugs that only affect the 2.0
branch and
rest are improvements.
Given that Tomcat is waiting on a DBCP release
On May 18, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
HttpClient is another example that is complained about by users :) The
only saving grace of v4 is that it is now named HttpComponents Core
(fitting Stephen's suggestion of a new name).
Well, this is kinda appropriate because I really have
If possible, I'd like karma for commons-sandbox. Also, I will
doing some work on cli and dbcp (to start) and if the PMC would
like to give me prelim-karma for that as well, that would be
appreciated :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On May 18, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
wrote:
On May 18, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
HttpClient is another example that is complained about by users :)
The
only saving grace of v4 is that it is now
DBCP - though any of the committers can apply but it gives
you names to hassle if there is no response.
Hen
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org wrote:
If possible, I'd like karma for commons-sandbox. Also, I will
doing some work on cli and dbcp (to start
26 matches
Mail list logo
