Re: [REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report March 2024

There’s a typo on the BCEL release - should be 6.8.2 rather than 3.8.2 Niall On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote: > Here it is for this quarter: > > ## Description: > The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of > Java-focused > reusable libraries and

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 12:08, Andrew Coates wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing a runtime failure using TarArchiveOutputStream when updating to > commons-compress 1.26.0. > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/codec/Charsets > at org.apache.commons.compress@1.26.0 > >

Re: lang

Hi Efthymiou, I would leave it out. You could guess that the next release is going to be 3.13.0 - but that might not be the case or your change might no make it into the next release for some reason. Making sure things like @since tags and release notes are all correct will be handled as part of

Re: Best Home for Checksum Implementations?

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:51 AM, sebb wrote: > I think Validator has some checksum code. > Yes, theres a checkdigit package: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-validator/apidocs/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/checkdigit/package-summary.html Niall > > On 24

Re: Reformatting commons-io to single code style ?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > +1 go for it. I'm in the unified code style camp. That's why I reformatted > the whole code base of BeanUtils2 a while back. > +1 from me too. Niall > > Kristian Rosenvold schrieb am Mo.,

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:53:37 -0500, Matt Benson wrote: > >> I think it is indicative of the position held by many, myself included, >> that a set of focused, math-related artifacts do not make sense at the >> Commons

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

e people together needs to take place somewhere and since here its been framed as a vote, then it would be good if those people who want to participate in a TLP effort would do so in this thread. Niall On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

"Collect Algorithms from ACM, >> Volume 1: Algorithms 1-220." I did not hold onto the microfiche of >> later algorithms that were published in conjunction with the ACM >> Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS). The latest (Algorithm >> 959) is interesting althou

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I would like to understand what happened when the such a [VOTE] passed > previously. > The TLP vote passed[1] and then there were discussions about the name[2] and composition of the PMC[3], then Phil

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, James Carman wrote: > We would take math through the incubator in order to build community around > it first. If we fail to do so, then we can decide its fate at that time. We > haven't done a good job attracting new people to math

Re: svn commit: r1747476 - in /commons/cms-site/trunk/content: site.xml xdoc/components.xml xdoc/index.xml.vm

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:37 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 June 2016 at 00:31, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Why? This wa

Re: svn commit: r1747476 - in /commons/cms-site/trunk/content: site.xml xdoc/components.xml xdoc/index.xml.vm

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Why? This was a good idea. > The links didn't get generated properly when I looked at it in the staging area - instead of "http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-crypto/; it was generating

Re: Apache Code of Conduct

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: > > http:/

Re: Apache Code of Conduct

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: > > http:/

Apache Code of Conduct

Hi, Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html I think we should include a link to it on the Commons Site - does anyone object to that? Thanks Niall

Re: [VALIDATOR] CheckDigit implementation for German identity cards?

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, sebb wrote: > On 5 May 2016 at 20:46, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um > > 22:49 Uhr: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have the need for a validator implementation that

Re: [all] apologies

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I am sorry for the bad tone of my recent posts here. Not the nicest > way to leave and I am sorry for that. > I dont think you have anything to apologize for and its disappointing to see you leave. I can understand

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring, > descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't > be offended if others want to be more creative. > > My suggestion is > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/2/15 5:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> [x] -1 We should not do this b

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, James Carman wrote: > [x] -1 We should not do this because... > > For the record, I am also -1 to this code contribution, at least if done in > this way. I would be happy to have this go through the incubator and build > some community

Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues

action in jelly! +1 Niall Bruno From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; Bruno P. Kinoshita brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:41 AM Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues

Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues

to use your branch, try to fix any failing tests and merge back onto trunk. Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-291 to track this issue. Thanks!Bruno From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Bruno P

Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with Maven2/3, having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions (src/test/java and src/main/java etc). I worked on a maven branch back in 2010 here:

Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:42 PM, sarahkm1972 sarahkm1...@gmail.com wrote: +100 to RERO. +1000 to release before we're all dead. It's been a decade people. Just cut a release already. You can always cut another one later. Stop with the excuses Whatever you want to call it - alpha, beta, RC,

[DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

Thought this might be of interest: http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html Niall

Re: [DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/18/14, 5:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: Thought this might be of interest: http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html I wonder what version of DBCP they were using. Guess you have to dig into the source to figure

Re: [Misc] how get NVD's CPE Entries managed by ASF

I dont have any idea - its not something I've ever seen brought up on the mailing lists here. It might be better to email the ASF security list http://www.apache.org/security/ Niall On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Bernd Eckenfels e...@zusammenkunft.netwrote: Hello, can somebody tell me

Re: svn commit: r1586926 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2: TestConnectionPool.java TestPStmtPoolingBasicDataSource.java

I don't see any value in test Javadocs and IMO they should be removed. Niall On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:47 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 April 2014 18:38, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/13/14, 10:33 AM, sebb wrote: Agreed; name will cause Java 8 Javadoc to report

Re: svn commit: r1586926 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2: TestConnectionPool.java TestPStmtPoolingBasicDataSource.java

On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/13/14, 3:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: I don't see any value in test Javadocs and IMO they should be removed. You mean from the website, right? Yes, sorry - I meant generating the test javadocs. Niall I think

Re: svn commit: r1582981 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk: build.xml pom.xml

I have fixed the JavaDoc issues with JDK 1.8 Niall On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.comwrote: Okay, agreed. I see three options here: 1. fix all javadoc errors 2. find a way to Set Xdoclint:none only if building with java 8 3. accept, that 3.3.2 can not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 based on RC3

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2014-03-12 13:37 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: [X] -1 I oppose this release because... I'm sorry to say but it is

Re: [beanutils2] Assertions class vs. lang Validate

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:50 PM, André Diermann andre.dierm...@gmail.comwrote: But will upgrading to 1.7 will solve the core issue, that some features (in detail: Assertions, MethodUitl and TypeUtil) are copied subsets of already implemented features in other Commons projects? Commons Lang

Re: [all] Removing websites of dormant components

I have no objection. Niall On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote: No objections or no interest? A few more comments would have been helpful. I am going to remove all dormant javadocs on friday or saturday. Not sure on the branding though. It is the

Re: [beanutils] Clirr report

Hi Oliver, The release notes wrt BEANUTILS-379 look good to me Thanks Niall On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.dewrote: Currently the Clirr report for BeanUtils in comparison with the previous version contains some errors. These are related to a change

Re: [SCXML] Next major version number required package rename needed?

I would bump to version 2.0 because I dont think its clear that going from 0.9 to 1.0 is a major version change - in my mind 0.9 seems to imply we haven't quite completed everything we want to for 1.0 Niall On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:52 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote: Now,

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept BeanShell to Commons Sandbox (Was: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator)

I think it would be better not separate the mechanics of accepting code from the community that comes with it. Can you be specific on who wants to join Commons to work on BeanShell? Niall On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: There are also a couple of

Re: [OT] Verifying releases Was: svn commit: r1452037 - /commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/bugs/Jira422TestCase.java

while ago not to use $Date$ and I did not want to see that creep back in again. No, you miss the point - not unnecessary - it was an invalid veto and you should be more circumspect about casting vetos. Niall Ralph On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: Niall Pemberton

Re: [OT] Verifying releases Was: svn commit: r1452037 - /commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/bugs/Jira422TestCase.java

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 March 2013 11:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: I'm not sure I understand what

Re: svn commit: r1452037 - /commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/bugs/Jira422TestCase.java

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote: Author: britter Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013 New Revision: 1452037 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037 Log: Add JavaDoc and SVN Keywords -1 Please don't use $Date$ - it is

Re: svn commit: r1452037 - /commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/bugs/Jira422TestCase.java

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 07/03/2013 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote: Author: britter Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013 New Revision: 1452037

Re: [BeanUtils] Removing @author tags?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: Hi, @author tags are no longer used, because authors are documented in pom.xml. I don't know the history of BeanUtils so I'm asking if there are any arguments against moving authors from source code files to pom.xml.

Re: [beanutils] describe() has strange behavior for collection properties ([BEANUTILS-409])

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: HI Naill 2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method

Re: [beanutils] describe() has strange behavior for collection properties ([BEANUTILS-409])

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection property describe will only return the first entry of this member.

Fwd:

http://www.ackairos.it/wmc5lt.php?s=lf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] Missing links on download page

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/24/12 1:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/24/12 4:37 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. [...] Commons Math can be downloaded from the following page:

Re: [Math] Missing links on download page

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/24/12 1:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/24/12 4:37 AM, Gilles

Re: [commons-parent] drop cobertura

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/29/12 10:44 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Any better suggestions for [math]? Yes, as I see it there are two options. a.) move some parts into a profile How exactly would this work? Can we get rid of stuff that way,

Re: [IO] BOMInputStream bug?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All: Does anyone have expertise with BOMInputStream? I know that some XML parsers (like the one shipped with the Oracle JRE) do not detect UTF-32 BOMs (UTF-8 and UTF-16 BOMs are OK) but using BOMInputStream is

Re: [IO] BOMInputStream bug?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All: Does anyone have expertise

Re: [csv] Performance comparison

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Le 13/03/2012 01:25, sebb a écrit : I'm concerned that the CSV code may grow and grow with private versions of code that could be provided by the JDK. By all means make sure the code is efficient in the way it uses

Re: [CSV] Site tidyup

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I think CSV is now converted to be a proper component; the website should synch in an hour or two. Someone needs to create a logo and store it at src/site/resources/images/csv-logo.png Also, I cannot remember how to derive the

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

+1 Niall On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons proper. There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:

Re: Common checkstyle (was Re: [vfs] checkstyle)

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 19/02/2012 20:26, Simone Tripodi wrote: So please explain me why the PMC should force OGNL guys on adopting a different style in a component where just a small subset of commons people (mainly Struts guys) is interested.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 based on RC1

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Oliver Heger wrote: I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am not sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in build.properties. This is not

Re: [IO] release 2.2?

January 2012 15:27, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: I find the behaviour of FileUtils.directoryContains() method very strange that it would return true for a file that doesn't exist. Since

Re: [DISCUSS] Restyling the commons-skin

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, we already discussed in the past that we would like to have a nice new style for the site, and I would like to take advantage from a discussion born in the incubator ML[1] to renew the discussion,

Re: [io] future release repo

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 September 2011 03:30, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer to avoid maven's automated release stuff. But hey, the important thing is getting a release out. Nexus != Maven; it's a staging repo. Yup, know

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

. Hard to take a decision... Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:21 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I agree with Paul here

Re: [io] LockableFileWriter.close() ignores exceptional return value of java.io.File.delete()

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Should LockableFileWriter.close() be changed from:    public void close() throws IOException {        try {            out.close();        } finally {            lockFile.delete();        } to:    public boolean

Re: [parent] time to vote on 22?

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote: Why is the idea plugin defined?  IntelliJ hasn't needed it in a long time. Good question. Should we get rid of it? +1 The warning at

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

of ContextBase it has no impact. Niall Also, what made me assume that the contract was for String-only keys was the fact that the test cases only use String keys (that is unless my memory is failing me). Thanks, -Elijah On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember

Re: [chain][v2] clever context

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:21 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I agree with Paul here.  Extending Map (or any other class for that matter) when what you really want to do is encapsulate it is silly. Is the Context really meant to be used in any place where a Map can be used?  

Re: [IO] 2.1 release?

I did mean to do this several months ago :( - but there were 2/3 Tailer bugs that I meant to have a look at. Anyway, on the basis of release (more-)often then go for it - can always do a bug fix for Tailer later. Niall On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote: Hi

Re: [chain][discuss] v2 upgrade - follow-up

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Are we still going to deploy Maven

Re: [compress] Keep old Javadocs?

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-07-25, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: If the URL do include the version, then it would be better to keep old version online, to avoid dangling links from external web pages, mail archives or documentation. Good

Re: [compress] Require Java5?

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: I think the argument is the other way. You should be explaining why you wouldn't simply just move to Java 5. +1 - Java 1.4 must die now.

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)

Apologies, I haven't had much time in the past few months and haven't really been following. I'm sure you guys have done a great job and am happy to leave the vote up to you. Niall On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Gary. So 4 +1s. Stephen,

Re: [all] OSGI bundle info - WAS [jira] [Created] (DBCP-363) dbcp bundle should use DynamicImport

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: This is over my head.  For all I know this may apply to all of our components, since I think the metadata comes from Commons Parent. Can someone knowledgeable in OSGI please have a look and comment on the ticket and post

Re: [all] OSGI bundle info - WAS [jira] [Created] (DBCP-363) dbcp bundle should use DynamicImport

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: This is over my head.  For all I know this may apply to all of our components, since I think the metadata comes from Commons Parent. Can

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote: On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Niall Pemberton wrote: If you use the Maven2 build then it should all build as expected. So it seems. I think I'll remove the release target from the ant build (so no-one else tries it and gets

Re: Rejoin the PMC...

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:16 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Since my work life is changing, I may just have more cycles to devote to my role as a PMC member.  I would like to re-join the PMC.  What is the process? Hopefully its just a case of asking, as you have done.

Re: Question about DBCP code usage

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 24/05/2011 15:09, Philippe Mouawad wrote: Hello, I have a question regarding code usage of DBCP. For another pool implementation that is an Apache project, Out of interest, which one? I would like to submit a patch

Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote: IMO domant is just an indication of a status. If someone goes and keeps on working stuff ... well ... then that status is nullified by merit. (not through a single commit though) I don't see a reason to forbid svn access

Re: [ALL] Binary archives without -bin incompatible with latest assembly plugin

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 5:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The assembly descriptor id (e.g. idsrc/id) is automatically appended to the name of the archives created by the assembly plugin. Up until version 2.2-beta-4 of the plugin, the id tag was allowed to be empty, but with 2.2 this

Re: svn commit: r1103145 - /commons/proper/net/trunk/pom.xml

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/15/11 2:40 PM, sebb wrote: On 14 May 2011 17:44, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/14/11 9:09 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Sat May 14 16:09:22 2011 New Revision: 1103145 URL:

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/11/11 8:40 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: On 11 April 2011 16:14, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: The point of keeping a working Ant build is for users who want to build from source and are not Maven users

Re: Looking for OGNL mentors!!!

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, the policy is to accept non-members as mentor #2 or #3. The requirement is that at least one member, or better two, must be present. Thats not how I understand it - mentors should be on the Incubator PMC.

Re: svn commit: r1086810 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/pom.xml

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:46 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 March 2011 02:00, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote: On 30 March 2011 01:13,  pste...@apache.org wrote

Re: svn commit: r1086810 - /commons/proper/pool/branches/POOL_1_X/pom.xml

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote: On 30 March 2011 01:13,  pste...@apache.org wrote: Author: psteitz Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011 New Revision: 1086810 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810view=rev Log:

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:  After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a while, I think we need to do something.  The documentation on the Commons web pages describes a process that works.  I suggest that we standardize on that

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:  After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a while, I think we need to do something.  The documentation on the Commons web pages

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011

Re: [ALL] consistent website page titles

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: I would rather have a shorter title like :   Commons Foo - Page name Thus the name of the component is likely to be fully visible on a browser tab. Otherwise you would see Apache Commons ... and wouldn't be able to

Re: svn commit: r1085247 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/site/xdoc/index.xml

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:55 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2011 03:50,  ggreg...@apache.org wrote: Author: ggregory Date: Fri Mar 25 03:50:47 2011 New Revision: 1085247 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085247view=rev Log: Use a Apache Commons Codec (TM) the first time

Re: svn commit: r1085247 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/site/xdoc/index.xml

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:11, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:55 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2011 03:50,  ggreg...@apache.org wrote: Author: ggregory Date: Fri

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19 - cancelled

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com

Re: [LOGGING] latest 1.1.1 release is not a valid OSGi bundle

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I just got an error in my OSGi environment because commons-logging-1.1.1 doesn't have the required OSGi metadata in the MANIFEST. Would you agree on releasing a 1.1.2 just to add this metadata?

Re: svn commit: r1084776 - /commons/proper/pool/trunk/pom.xml

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 March 2011 23:37, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:28 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 March 2011 23:14, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: I think maven best

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Parent 20 based on RC1

+1, looks good. The URL was incorrect, I tested with the following: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-009 Thanks for doing these changes/releases Sebb. Niall On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:15 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Please may I have your votes for

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 March 2011 00:23, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: OK +1 from me then. Is that +1 for Skin and +1 for Parent? Yes, +1 to both Niall Niall On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg

Re: Trademakrs and logos. WAS beanutils commit msg...

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/12/11 8:45 AM, sebb wrote: On 12 March 2011 04:20, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I thought we had agreed that we are not going to do this, i.e., maintain that commons-foo is *not* an ASF trademark.  

Re: [VOTE][DAEMON] Release Maven artifacts for 1.0.5

+1 Niall On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:00 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Some users wish to have a release of Commons Daemon via Maven. So have I extracted the binary, javadoc and source jars from the 1.0.5 binary release, and created a bundle which has been uploaded to:

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

Looks OK to me. The only thing is IMO we should wait on the outcome from Phil's trademark enquiry before releasing these. I just tried it out on Commons IO and saw the following footer on every page: Apache Commons, Apache Commons IO, Commons IO, Apache, the Apache feather logo, and the Apache

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

OK +1 from me then. Niall On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: I'd just like to press along to pick up the new vers of plugins. We can fiddle the tm for the next go around. Gary On Mar 12, 2011, at 18:06, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19 - cancelled

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: The rc profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies any more. Not sure what's caused

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19 - cancelled

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19 - cancelled

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March

Re: svn commit: r1079608 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/pom.xml

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote: On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton niall.pember

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >