On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:

> 2015-05-25 8:07 GMT+02:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>:
>
> > Thanks for clarifying Niall.
> >
> > I'll try to fix the tests, and will try to generate the Maven site and
> the
> > tags documentation.
> > Probably I'll update the commons-parent version in the pom.xml, and will
> > use the new bootstrap style too - which is already used by other commons
> > components.
> >
> > Once that's done I'll post to the mailing list proposing to merge the
> > branch into trunk.
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Go for it! Great to see some action in jelly!
>

+1

Niall


>
>
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> >       From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
> >  To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>; Bruno P.
> Kinoshita
> > <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>
> >  Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:41 AM
> >  Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues
> >
> > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
> > brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Nial
> > > Do you know why your branch wasn't merged?
> >
> >
> > I dont really remember. I'm not sure whether all issues were resolved
> > (perhaps around tags doc generation). I sent the following email at the
> > start of 2010 - but I did some more work after that email:
> >     * http://markmail.org/message/yveew57uparj3aab
> >
> > I think the main reason though was that jelly was petty dormant and there
> > was no real interest.
> >
> > Niall
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I've checked it out and a few tests are failing with Maven 3.2.5 and
> Java
> > > 7 & 8. But I'd like to use your branch, try to fix any failing tests
> and
> > > merge back onto trunk.
> > > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-291 to track this
> > > issue.
> > > Thanks!Bruno
> > >
> > >
> > >      From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
> > >  To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > > Cc: Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>
> > >  Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:36 AM
> > >  Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with
> Maven2/3,
> > > > having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions
> > > > (src/test/java and src/main/java etc).
> > > >
> > >
> > > I worked on a maven branch back in 2010 here:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jelly/branches/MAVEN-2-BRANCH
> > >
> > > Niall
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I see that a start has been made, but it looks like there is some way
> > to
> > > > go yet.
> > > >
> > > > On 10 May 2015 at 10:48, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
> > brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Paul
> > > > >> if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I
> > was
> > > > > unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
> > > > > "standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
> > > > > context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
> > > > > Any kind of background on old issues is welcome! Before I start to
> > work
> > > > on any issue,
> > > > > I'll triage old issues, try to find some low hanging fruits, and
> then
> > > > will start a one or two dayresearch on the mailing list to see if I
> can
> > > > learn as much as possible before coding.
> > > > >>I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly
> > and
> > > > > I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning
> > technology,
> > > > > that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the
> > > time
> > > > > I met them.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will work a little bit every weekend on triage issues, but will
> > have
> > > a
> > > > one or two week cyclein the middle of June and in July (lovely
> weather
> > > for
> > > > coding; cold, cloudy, and raining a lot :)
> > > > >
> > > > >>Hope it helps.
> > > > >>I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better.
> > > > >
> > > > > It definitely helps. Very happy for having someone I can ask
> > questions
> > > > about some old issuesin [jelly] :)
> > > > > ThanksBruno
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >      From: Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net>
> > > > >  To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > > > >  Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 8:33 AM
> > > > >  Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/05/15 10:22, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> > > > >> Since I joined Commons I've had a special interest in [jelly] due
> to
> > > > its importance in the Jenkins project.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jenkins uses a patched version of [jelly]. Kohsuke, creator of
> > > Jenkins,
> > > > is/was a Commons committer too, and submitted some issues. I intend
> to
> > > > investigate if that'd be doable fix the issues to a point that
> Jenkins
> > > can
> > > > drop the patched version, and [jelly] can be updated and released
> > again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Bruno,
> > > > >
> > > > > if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I
> > was
> > > > > unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
> > > > > "standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
> > > > > context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thus, I can only encourage you to go ahead. I think it would be
> nice
> > to
> > > > > have both worlds working well with a single code base.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly
> > and
> > > > > I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning
> > technology,
> > > > > that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the
> > > time
> > > > > I met them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope it helps.
> > > > > I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better.
> > > > >
> > > > > paul
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter
>

Reply via email to