Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-29 Thread Ralph Goers
One other thing. The conf directory needs to be copied to the WebDAV server at the base uri. Ralph On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: I need to document this. When you run all the tests TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder is skipped because it is really a functional test - it

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-29 Thread Ralph Goers
On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:03 AM, sebb wrote: Can one also run the tests by adding -Dtest.webdav.uri=webdav://admin:ad...@192.168.10.133:7402/vfstest/ test-data etc. to the command-line? That's perhaps simpler for one-off tests. No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-29 Thread sebb
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:08 AM, sebb wrote: On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system properties that get set in addition to

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Ralph Goers wrote: I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try. Ralph Yes, the test is now successful. Thanks for the fix! Oliver On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Ralph Goers schrieb: On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Hey, this

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Oliver Heger schrieb: Ralph Goers wrote: I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try. Ralph Yes, the test is now successful. Thanks for the fix! Oliver When doing some further tests I noticed a strange behavior of TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder: A mvn test works, but

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-28 Thread Ralph Goers
I need to document this. When you run all the tests TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder is skipped because it is really a functional test - it requires a WebDAV server to be available. To run the test you need to add something like profile idwebdav/id activation

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-26 Thread Ralph Goers
I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try. Ralph On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Ralph Goers schrieb: On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Hey, this really looks interesting! Unfortunately, I am pretty busy ATM and will need some time to

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-25 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks, I've tried uploading to the old snapshot repo but kept getting a 401. Brian Fox set up the new repo so that commons could use it. I've uploaded a snapshot to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ . I have updated the pom on my local machine to deploy there

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Ralph Goers schrieb: On Mar 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-23 Thread Ralph Goers
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Hey, this really looks interesting! Unfortunately, I am pretty busy ATM and will need some time to grasp the concepts. However, I have now a build problem: Maven complains that it cannot find the vfs snapshot jar (see below). Do we need to

[Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-22 Thread Ralph Goers
I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking this code in as soon as I

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-22 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Ralph Goers schrieb: I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking this code

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

2009-03-22 Thread Ralph Goers
On Mar 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem