On 2009-03-26, Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org wrote:
If the code has been tested by the folks at hadoop I trust it very
much. (They do extensive testing!) and would be all for replacing the
current code base.
I just did it 8-)
svn revision 759143
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be a silly idea to include both variants?
I'd clearly tend to avoid that. It would likely cause confusion.
On a related matter: Stefan, wouldn't it be possible for the others to
start using compress?
Jochen
--
I have
On 26/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks,
first of all I don't know enough about the bzip2 format to undestand
the existing code, nor the one I'll be pointing at further down.
The current code in compress is the one of Ant 1.7.1 and versions
prior to 1.7.0. In
On 26/03/2009, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be a silly idea to include both variants?
I'd clearly tend to avoid that. It would likely cause confusion.
Surely that depends on how well it is
If the code has been tested by the folks at hadoop I trust it very
much. (They do extensive testing!) and would be all for replacing the
current code base. But IMO that's no blocker. In the end the algorithm
should be a black box for everyone using compress. So changing this in
a later release
On a related matter: Stefan, wouldn't it be possible for the others to
start using compress?
Not sure who the others may be.
As for Ant, I don't expect it to move away from its own classes.
Creating jars is a core requirement for a build tool for Java and the
Ant community probably won't
