RE: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
[X] Go on with JDK 1.5 [ ] Go on with JDK 1.4 [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason: - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-24 Thread Luc Maisonobe
+1 for JDK 1.5 Luc Mario Ivankovits a écrit : Hi! Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with jdk1.5? As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2 api I do

[vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with jdk1.5? As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2 api I do not plan to introduce generics yet (I don't see that

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Filip Defoort
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ X] Go on with JDK 1.5 [ ] Go on with JDK 1.4 [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason: Cheers, - Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2008, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with jdk1.5? It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 and 1.1

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! It's easy enough to get 1.3 from java.sun.com ... I also got 1.2 and 1.1 from there recently. Ah, yes, now I found it too, it's in archive. Since the API might not drastically change it should not be required to rename the package to vfs5 or vfs2 or whatever. Not sure I

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
[X] Go on with JDK 1.5 Niall On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 with jdk1.5? As long as no other

Re: [vote][vfs] set minimum java version to 1.5

2008-05-23 Thread James Carman
Here's my vote. I still think we should come up with a standardized plan for when we change package names. There are different situations that we need to consider: 1. Jumping JDK/language versions. 2. API Incompatibility 3. Serialization incompatibility. [X] Go on with JDK 1.5 [ ] Go on