...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 08:50
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config part 2
On 10/25/10 11:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Thank you for working through
Gary,
I tossed this around as well, and noted these fields as a possible promote
to the Abstract configuration, because I agree that there probably isn't a
good reason why one pool has those features and the other doesn't. (if
this is indeed the case, these would probably best be tracked in two
On 10/25/10 11:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Thank you for working through this Simone.
I would like to discuss something I took for granted in my experimental patch
for [POOL-173]. I can see that you took and a more conservative (and safer ;)
approach in your version. I am glad to see this
-Original Message-
From: Steven Siebert [mailto:smsi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 08:43
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config part 2
Gary,
I tossed this around as well, and noted these fields as a possible promote
to the Abstract
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 08:50
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config part 2
On 10/25/10 11:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Thank you for working through this Simone.
I would like
