On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:31:44AM -, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jed Smith [mailto:j...@jedsmith.org]
> > Sent: 10 January 2013 21:27
> > Subject: Re: Project Culture and Commit Rights
>
> ...
>
> > The tool isn't the issue here, and I disagree with any attem
> -Original Message-
> From: Jed Smith [mailto:j...@jedsmith.org]
> Sent: 10 January 2013 21:27
> Subject: Re: Project Culture and Commit Rights
...
> The tool isn't the issue here, and I disagree with any attempt to reframe it
> that way.
+1
Ross
There is nothing wrong with Subversion except for preference and
difficulty in making branches. I disagree that Benson's topic is
directly influenced by such a lower-rung choice as a version control
system. The same discussion would be necessary if Apache were
completely on Git; who can push direct
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Benson Margulies:
>> Anyone can read http://www.apache.org/dev/open-access-svn.html to see a
>> summary of the central idea that started this discussion: that the default
>> authorization scheme for Subversion at Apache should be to grant techn
Benson Margulies:
> Anyone can read http://www.apache.org/dev/open-access-svn.html to see a
> summary of the central idea that started this discussion: that the default
> authorization scheme for Subversion at Apache should be to grant technical
> permission to commit to all committers across the F
