There is no need for any PMC or ASF at large to respond to this marketing
nonsense. It is equivalent of a mud fight, and we can choose to not get
dirty.
PMCs can of course publish data, such as benchmarks and other hard facts,
but should refrain from debatable opinions, such as whether OSS innovat
Thanks Andrea. I don’t see them there yet, so maybe they are
still delayed. Do you know how I can check if they are delayed,
or if I simply uploaded them wrong? Thanks!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and
Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
Great seeing you all at ApacheCon. Quick question - I got my
slides uploaded after my talk(s) (late of course) to the website -
who should I poke at LF to make sure they are on the website? I
am not seeing them and I’m sure it’s something I’m doing wrong?
Assumin
Hey Everyone,
Great seeing you all at ApacheCon. Quick question - I got my
slides uploaded after my talk(s) (late of course) to the website -
who should I poke at LF to make sure they are on the website? I
am not seeing them and I’m sure it’s something I’m doing wrong?
Cheers,
Chris
Hi
Should all *-extra projects from Apache Extra move together to the new home or
can each project choose separately the
new home?
Regards
Krzysztof
On 12.03.2015 22:37, David Nalley wrote:
> It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
> decision. I have interacted wi
Yes, I have no problem with json vs xml: the question is more to define the
schema like doap did it, and write documentation for projects to know where to
publish what information
editing current generated json just creates a new information source, without
any documentation
My point is: afaik
For ASF events, I believe we use this:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/anti-harassment.html
My understanding was that our CoC and our anti-harassment policies
compliment each other. But perhaps we want to roll one into the other?
On 18 April 2015 at 18:19, jan i wrote:
> On 16 April
On 16 April 2015 at 22:41, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Hey, after an awesome week at ApacheCon, I noticed that we have a
> different published code of conduct for the conference - as the official
> LF site has - than the one we publish for the ASF overall:
>
>
>
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/pol
LOL, below.
I highly recommend separating the model from the views, so that we can
efficiently enable our volunteer's energy here to actually accomplish
something valuable.
So let's work on stuff to do that excites us, but remember to keep the
technical problems focused on what this PMC believes
On Saturday, April 18, 2015, wrote:
> It was told the new site would use native json, instead of doap
> But I'm not convinced at all, since Doap is an invaluable source of info,
> documented, and so on
json is also a documented standard, that in general is more known, and I
believe has more tool
On Saturday, April 18, 2015, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> We had a great session, and a lot of energy, hopefully we can make some
> progress. One note: this needs to be a comdev PMC project, and we need
> to really plan the data part out if we want to be successful.
Yeah we had a great discussion, b
It was told the new site would use native json, instead of doap
But I'm not convinced at all, since Doap is an invaluable source of info,
documented, and so on
then imho it would be better to generate json from doap
I disabled the json edit feature recently since it will cause problems
regards
12 matches
Mail list logo
