Re: Presentation selections for ACEU 2015 Budapest.

> On Apr 20, 2015, at 10:43 AM, jan i wrote: > > Hi. > > Rereading today's threads about ACEU 2015, made me realize that I have been > unclear. > > For ACEU 2015, intention is to use the following outline: > > 1) LF define the theme(s) for the conference > 2) CFP open officially with announce

FW: ESIP Update: Summer Meeting Theme Finalized, ESIP Testbed Update, Education Committee  | News from AGU, Extreme Precip Hangout & USGS

Hello Everyone, Please note that the Summer Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP) meeting is looking for plenary speakers to deal with resiliency as it relates to open source software projects. There are many people on this list and around the ASF that know a lot about this. I encourage you to

Presentation selections for ACEU 2015 Budapest.

Hi. Rereading today's threads about ACEU 2015, made me realize that I have been unclear. For ACEU 2015, intention is to use the following outline: 1) LF define the theme(s) for the conference 2) CFP open officially with announcement(s) defining the content wanted 3) CFP closes and LF selects tal

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

I'd like to see, and will propose: The History of the ASF: Starting from the Apache Group in 1995 to today, how did the ASF start, where is it now, and where is it going?

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

Great. Thanks for clarifying. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: >

RE: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

We is the ASF. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Pierre Smits Sent: ‎4/‎20/‎2015 8:28 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15 Quoting: '*we* do not have to ask it. The

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

Quoting: '*we* do not have to ask it. The LF do' But that 'we' is confusing. Who is that? You? I? The coordinator? The Board? Anyway, then 'we' can indeed sit back and relax, and wait for clarification and/or the invitation from the LF. Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

On 20 April 2015 at 16:51, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > ApacheCon is created by the LF. It will have a tighter focus on talks that > bring people. Our community defined and selected tracks simply do not > create a good conference (from the perspective of the p

RE: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

*we* do not have to ask it. The LF do. The ASF are responsible for proposing (via CFP) content. We are not responsible for selecting it. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Pierre Smits Sent: ‎4/‎20/‎2015 8:05 AM To: dev@community.apac

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

Asking 'Which content' delivers many viewpoints. You have to ask it first to get the answers leading to focus for the best production ever. As stated in previous posting 'the ASF is responsible for content' and 'We have little say in what it will be', please elaborate on this? Meaning: the LF will

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

On 20 April 2015 at 16:52, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi, > > LF. The CFP(s) will open shortly after, and I hope no later than next week. > > > > > Interesting, cause I think one is already capable of submitting a talk for > ACNEU 2015 via the LF site. > Is this intentional, or by accident? > It hap

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

Hi, LF. The CFP(s) will open shortly after, and I hope no later than next week. > > Interesting, cause I think one is already capable of submitting a talk for ACNEU 2015 via the LF site. Is this intentional, or by accident? regards, Achim

RE: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

ApacheCon is created by the LF. It will have a tighter focus on talks that bring people. Our community defined and selected tracks simply do not create a good conference (from the perspective of the paying attendee). What this means is that we have, moving forwards, very little say in what trac

Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15

Hi. Thanks a lot for taking time to reach out to communities, and mailing it here. LF is responsible for producing the event, as well as carrying the financial responsibility, while ASF is responsible for the content. This seems very clear until you start asking "which content", because that hig

Proposing tracks for ACEU15

Hi all, In the weeks prior to ACNA15 I have reached out to a few communities to gather momentum for ACEU15. Based on what is in the portfolio of the ASF quite a lot of interesting tracks could be built. Before the doors of the CFP opens we could investigate potential topic clusters (anything goes)

Re: Wiki apacheCON

On 20 April 2015 at 15:58, Rich Bowen wrote: > Added ACNA 2016 as well. Hopefully we can get the CFP for that going soon, > so that we have a few months extra lead time this year. > "soon" is good, but please allow ACEU 2015 a head start, to avoid any potential confusion (remember how many times

Re: Wiki apacheCON

Added ACNA 2016 as well. Hopefully we can get the CFP for that going soon, so that we have a few months extra lead time this year. --Rich On 04/19/2015 03:29 PM, jan i wrote: For info. I just updated: http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage Pushing the Austin content into ACNA15. It s

Re: Wiki apacheCON

On 20 April 2015 at 00:54, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2015-04-19 22:29 GMT+03:00 jan i : > > For info. > > > > I just updated: > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage > > > > Pushing the Austin content into ACNA15. > > Great! > > Note though that "ApacheCon North America 2015, Austin,

Project Visualization Tool: Linkurious + incubator-streams

re > - Visualizations. There's lots of different stuff to do here, and I > think it'd be super helpful if everyone just did something they want, > and then show us the code. I spent some time on this and have something to share: Commercial graph browser linkurio.us seeded with contents of people