Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-06-10 Thread Igor Galić
re because of the OOo proposal > to the incubator. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 15:39 > To: dev@community.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence? &g

RE: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-06-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
ay, June 01, 2011 15:39 To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence? On 20/05/2011 15:07, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 20/05/2011 14:35, Shane Curcuru wrote: [ ... ] > > I've put the content in the staging area. I have *not* proofed it or >

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-06-01 Thread Ross Gardler
On 20/05/2011 15:07, Ross Gardler wrote: On 20/05/2011 14:35, Shane Curcuru wrote: Benson Margulies wrote: There are some minor English language issues, like agreement in number. Sean, do you want edits? I'm not sure if Sean wants edits, since I don't know which Sean you mean. [1] But I'm ha

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-20 Thread Ross Gardler
On 20/05/2011 14:35, Shane Curcuru wrote: Benson Margulies wrote: There are some minor English language issues, like agreement in number. Sean, do you want edits? I'm not sure if Sean wants edits, since I don't know which Sean you mean. [1] But I'm happy if people want to copy or adapt this b

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-20 Thread Benson Margulies
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> There are some minor English language issues, like agreement in >> number. Sean, do you want edits? or, dear, s/sean/shane/. Naughty Iphone! > > I'm not sure if Sean wants edits, since I don't know which Sean y

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-20 Thread Shane Curcuru
Benson Margulies wrote: There are some minor English language issues, like agreement in number. Sean, do you want edits? I'm not sure if Sean wants edits, since I don't know which Sean you mean. [1] But I'm happy if people want to copy or adapt this blog posting to use on any apache.org web

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-18 Thread Ross Gardler
t; --- Em ter, 17/5/11, Ross Gardler escreveu: > >> De: Ross Gardler >> Assunto: Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence? >> Para: dev@community.apache.org >> Data: Terça-feira, 17 de Maio de 2011, 20:24 >> On 17/05/2011 14:08, Ross Gardler >>

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > ...I think there is a typo in http://community.apache.org/. Under "Event > organisers and speakers", there is a "[...] will fined our speakers section > useful."... Fixed, thanks! -Bertrand

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-17 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
er, 17/5/11, Ross Gardler escreveu: > De: Ross Gardler > Assunto: Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence? > Para: dev@community.apache.org > Data: Terça-feira, 17 de Maio de 2011, 20:24 > On 17/05/2011 14:08, Ross Gardler > wrote: > > On 16/05/2011 17:36, Shane

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-17 Thread Ross Gardler
On 17/05/2011 14:08, Ross Gardler wrote: On 16/05/2011 17:36, Shane Curcuru wrote: A number of different issues recently about commercial influence in our projects have had me thinking about the importance that Apache projects are managed independently. Since this isn't explicitly stated in the

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-17 Thread Ross Gardler
On 16/05/2011 17:36, Shane Curcuru wrote: A number of different issues recently about commercial influence in our projects have had me thinking about the importance that Apache projects are managed independently. Since this isn't explicitly stated in the obvious places, I wrote a little essay for

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-16 Thread Benson Margulies
There are some minor English language issues, like agreement in number. Sean, do you want edits? On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Upayavira wrote: > +! reads well and clarifies some useful points we often take for > granted. > > Upayavira > > On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:58 -0400, "Michael McCandless"

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-16 Thread Upayavira
+! reads well and clarifies some useful points we often take for granted. Upayavira On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:58 -0400, "Michael McCandless" wrote: > +1 this is an important topic and you explain it well. > > I'm not sure where it should go but I agree it should be somewhere > "permanent" and visi

Re: Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-16 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 this is an important topic and you explain it well. I'm not sure where it should go but I agree it should be somewhere "permanent" and visible. Mike http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > A number of different issues recently about commercial

Apache project guidelines docs += independence?

2011-05-16 Thread Shane Curcuru
A number of different issues recently about commercial influence in our projects have had me thinking about the importance that Apache projects are managed independently. Since this isn't explicitly stated in the obvious places, I wrote a little essay for my personal blog: http://communityoverco