Daniel Ruggeri wrote on 12/30/16 3:23 PM:
>
> On 12/29/2016 3:11 PM, sebb wrote:
>> However, AFAICT dev == dev; there is no devs.
>> No point adding unnecessary aliases; in fact I think that would be
>> counter-productive.
>> And what about commit/commits, issue/issues etc?
>
> Yep. Fair point. I
On 12/29/2016 3:11 PM, sebb wrote:
> However, AFAICT dev == dev; there is no devs.
> No point adding unnecessary aliases; in fact I think that would be
> counter-productive.
> And what about commit/commits, issue/issues etc?
Yep. Fair point. Is there an easily digestible list-of-lists aside from
On 29 December 2016 at 15:34, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> On 12/29/2016 5:57 AM, Gavin Mabie wrote:
>> would it not be advisable/preferable that the ASF ensures the best
>> contributor's experience possible by enabling wrongfully addressed
>> user@.a.o.
>> mails get delivered to users@.a.o. and wron
On 12/29/2016 5:57 AM, Gavin Mabie wrote:
> would it not be advisable/preferable that the ASF ensures the best
> contributor's experience possible by enabling wrongfully addressed
> user@.a.o.
> mails get delivered to users@.a.o. and wrongfully
> users@.a.o.
> get delivered to user@.a.o.?
>
>
> It
Happy New Year!
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Pierre Smits
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> *Pre-amble*
> Today, while responding to an posting in one of the mailing lists, I
> experienced a failure by the mailer deamon of the ASF.
>
> In this case I tried to send an email to user@infra.a.o.
>
> *The is
Hi all,
*Pre-amble*
Today, while responding to an posting in one of the mailing lists, I
experienced a failure by the mailer deamon of the ASF.
In this case I tried to send an email to user@infra.a.o.
*The issue*
The issue is that the ASF allows offices and project to use both user@ and
users@ a
