---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14621/#review26955
---
Haven't tested it but it looks right to me. I'll try and test over t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14621/
---
Review request for cordova and Jeffrey Heifetz.
Bugs: CB-4774
https://issue
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz wrote:
> So I'm not sure if we ever came to a true consensus about this, but the
> code has been up for a while now [1]. If there are no complaints in say
> 24hrs I think its reasonable to merge it in.
>
Hooray for lazy consensus! :)
Seriously, th
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> The eval of the jasmine interface deserves mention. Is the motivation
> there that tests can choose to use another testing framework? That's why
> you don't just make jasmine functions globals?
>
I was hoping the plugins would need to depen
Seems quite useful actually. He could support versions via git tags (if he
added that in, plugman already supports it)... Probably the main difference
(besides he's scraped github), is that he's not hosting tgz files.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Wowzers! That's a lot
Wowzers! That's a lot of xml files!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jesse wrote:
> There are 4021 xml files on github with the namespace :
> http://cordova.apache.org/ns/plugins/1.0
>
>
> https://github.com/search?l=xml&q=http%3A%2F%2Fcordova.apache.org%2Fns%2Fplugins%2F1.0&ref=advsearch&type=
The eval of the jasmine interface deserves mention. Is the motivation there
that tests can choose to use another testing framework? That's why you
don't just make jasmine functions globals?
One nit pick just from reading your email is that this will cause the test
js-modules to be injected into ap
Maybe we should contact him to help out with our official registry! We
could use some UX
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Yeah especially since I'm sure none of us submitted anything he's just
> seeding stuff more like
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jesse wrote:
>
There are 4021 xml files on github with the namespace :
http://cordova.apache.org/ns/plugins/1.0
https://github.com/search?l=xml&q=http%3A%2F%2Fcordova.apache.org%2Fns%2Fplugins%2F1.0&ref=advsearch&type=Code
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Yeah esp
Yeah especially since I'm sure none of us submitted anything he's just
seeding stuff more like
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jesse wrote:
> and apparently I have 2 ... this is going to confuse people, since most of
> them are just different forks of the same repos.
>
> @purplecabbage
> r
It's probably the Firefox OS plugin stuff
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jesse wrote:
> herm wong has 3 plugins up there! wtf?
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
>
> > I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
> > r
Definitely looks better and it reports engine versions! ;)
hint hint https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4896
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
> references git URLs. There is no notion of version so you'd h
and apparently I have 2 ... this is going to confuse people, since most of
them are just different forks of the same repos.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jesse wrote:
> herm wong has 3 plugins up there! wtf?
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2
herm wong has 3 plugins up there! wtf?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
> references git URLs. There is no notion of version so you'd have to
> pull from master.
> It definitely looks
I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
references git URLs. There is no notion of version so you'd have to
pull from master.
It definitely looks better than plugins.cordova.io though xD!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Saw this from a comment on one of m
Saw this from a comment on one of my blog posts:
http://www.plugreg.com/
done.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Jesse wrote:
> done: purplecabbage
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
>
>> I don't see your user account. You need to create one with `plugman
>> adduser`
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jesse w
done: purplecabbage
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> I don't see your user account. You need to create one with `plugman
> adduser`
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jesse wrote:
> > can you 'pwn' me too?
> >
> > @purplecabbage
> > risingj.com
I don't see your user account. You need to create one with `plugman adduser`
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jesse wrote:
> can you 'pwn' me too?
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
>
>> done
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Andrew Gri
can you 'pwn' me too?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> done
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Andrew Grieve
> wrote:
> > Awesome!
> >
> > Could you add me as an owner for the plugins?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Anis Kadri (JI
done
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Awesome!
>
> Could you add me as an owner for the plugins?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Anis Kadri (JIRA) wrote:
>
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpa
TLDR; I've implemented a plugin testing strategy that requires 0 new
tooling features, can support non-core plugins, and hopefully even support
a variety of methods for running/reporting the test results. Super alpha
preview, but take a look if you like the direction!
NEW: CDVTest Plugin: https:
+1
would like to come, Red Hat is interested to contribute on platforms as
well.
--
Gorkem
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Working via email is fun, but seeing each other in person is fun too!
>
> I'd like to invite committers / active contributors who are able to join
>
I'm throwing something together right now, actually. I'll post my current
progress today so you can take a look.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Sorry keep meaning to respond. I like Michal's first step but growing to a
> full suite of tools. Are you currently tackling
Sorry keep meaning to respond. I like Michal's first step but growing to a
full suite of tools. Are you currently tackling this Braden? I feel like it
is related to the Medic stuff and maybe we should throw one of our guys on
the problem fully.
On Sep 27, 2013 5:10 PM, "Braden Shepherdson" wrote
That works. Or even just tag and wipe it out, add the new bits. Either way:
you should be able to commit directly very soon. =)
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:15 AM, David Kemp wrote:
> Although it is not how I got to where the product is, I can fairly easily
> make a buildbot branch from the exisin
I might be able to create something new here.
What sizes and formats are needed? Would something short in duration work best,
or does it need to be longer than ~15 seconds?
On Oct 10, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5053
I think that likely is the case. See if creating a dummy project on the
same machine fixes it.
Clearly a poor design choice. Filed an issue for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5063
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Axel Nennker wrote:
> Hi,
> I moved to a new developement machine a
Hi,
I moved to a new developement machine and installed the latest phonegap
using npm -g install phonegap.
Then I checked out a phonegap project (3.0) from our git repo.
Now I want to build the Android part but get the message below.
Is this happening because I never did a "phonegap platform add
Although it is not how I got to where the product is, I can fairly easily
make a buildbot branch from the exising medic repo.
I will re-create a clean branch of the existing repo with my work. That
will then show the common history,
David Kemp
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:12 AM, David Kemp wrote
It would not be a clean merge, there are considerable differences. I
started with medic, but many parts have been replaced.
My repo contains many elements and structure from the original though.
Because the overall project structure changed a great deal with 3.0, it was
going to be a lot of work t
31 matches
Mail list logo
