Lgtm! Ship!
I'll point to it in the blog post.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
After all this discussion, it's a bit unclear to me where we are currently
at. So I took a shot at capturing it in writing it for coho/docs/
versioning-and-release-strategy.md.
GitHub user EvgenyAgafonchikov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/54
CB-7744: Add support for git-depth flag to coho clone
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/MSOpenTech/cordova-coho
Github user Clafou closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/26
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user Clafou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/26#issuecomment-59035417
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cmarcelk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53#discussion_r18834684
--- Diff: docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md ---
@@ -19,17 +19,100 @@
#
--
-# Versioning and Release Strategy
+# Versioning
Github user cmarcelk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53#discussion_r18834641
--- Diff: docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md ---
@@ -19,17 +19,100 @@
#
--
-# Versioning and Release Strategy
+# Versioning
Github user mmocny commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53#discussion_r18835133
--- Diff: docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md ---
@@ -19,17 +19,100 @@
#
--
-# Versioning and Release Strategy
+# Versioning
Github user cmarcelk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53#discussion_r18835781
--- Diff: docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md ---
@@ -19,17 +19,100 @@
#
--
-# Versioning and Release Strategy
+# Versioning
Github user cmarcelk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Pull request has been merged. Thanks for the feedback.
On Oct 14, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Lgtm! Ship!
I'll point to it in the blog post.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
After all this discussion, it's a bit
Github user mmocny commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53#discussion_r18836492
--- Diff: docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md ---
@@ -19,17 +19,100 @@
#
--
-# Versioning and Release Strategy
+# Versioning
Github user cmarcelk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/53#discussion_r18838799
--- Diff: docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md ---
@@ -19,17 +19,100 @@
#
--
-# Versioning and Release Strategy
+# Versioning
Very cool Parashuram.
How did you test WkWebView? non-cordova?
Also, the results have different labels on iOS/Android, which I assume
means you are just reporting what the tools report. Would you consider
mapping the values which have direct parallels to the same labels so we can
do more
Please review and send pull requests!
https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2014-10-13-cordova-4.md
Well done.
One meta-comment: We highlight that the 4.0 CLI release is a reflection of
our independent platform release direction, yet all the platforms are
updating and set to the same version (3.6.4). Would be useful to point out
that this is one last synchronized release?
-Michal
On Tue, Oct
Steven Gill wrote:
Please review and send pull requests!
https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2014-10-13-cordov
a-4.md
Working on it...
.. also `cordova info` is not listing my platform versions. `cordova
platform ls` does.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Well done.
One meta-comment: We highlight that the 4.0 CLI release is a reflection of
our independent platform release direction,
looks great: thank you steve!
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please review and send pull requests!
https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2014-10-13-cordova-4.md
Updated with Josh's PR and added a point about platform versions being in
the 3.6.x range and expecting it to change.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
looks great: thank you steve!
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com
Shazron Abdullah wrote:
The lists do not contain footers by default. I’ve requested them:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8425
The INFRA issue is resolved! Much rejoicing.
I object.
I believe they are poorly configured and are making a total hash of my
messages.
Take:
Github user samedii commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/108#issuecomment-59129706
@shazron Done, may take some time to go through though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user daserge opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-inappbrowser/pull/69
Windows platform fixes
Fixes the following Windows platform issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7688
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7692
Not sure how to fix this for you, it’s best to bug the experts at INFRA by
filing an issue I suppose.
I haven’t had any problems yet, so far.
On Oct 14, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
Shazron Abdullah wrote:
The lists do not contain footers by default. I’ve
Github user shazron commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/195#issuecomment-59140475
Looks like @x.y.z:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/versioning-and-release-strategy.md#version-behavior
---
If your project is set up for
Hello devs,
I am currently testing mobilespec 3.6.3 and I found a test case failing in
whitelist.
The test case is written like
itShouldMatch('file:///foo.html', [ ]);
As I understand that a new whitelist URL file:///foo.htmlfile:///\\foo.html
is added and then tested for the pattern []. The
25 matches
Mail list logo
