Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218911859
@stevengill done!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218910842
Passed! Lets merge this in @riknoll :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218906307
Travis taking forever
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Richard Knoll
wrote:
> I'll merge whenever the Travis
Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218892839
I'll merge whenever the Travis build finishes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218892010
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218885704
:shipit:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user riknoll commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#discussion_r63097000
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/plugin.js ---
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ module.exports = function plugin(command, targets,
opts) {
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#discussion_r63092520
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/plugin.js ---
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ module.exports = function plugin(command, targets,
opts) {
Github user macdonst commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-218824969
@stevengill it was working pretty good last I checked. With the config.xml
stuff in it should be ready to go. I've earmarked some time tomorrow to do my
testing.
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218672448
LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/390#issuecomment-218649503
Amazon-fireos has actually been deprecated. It is recommended to target the
android platform instead when releasing for amazon
---
If your project is set up
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/236#issuecomment-218633214
I'd like to revive this PR. Hooks should run when using create scripts +
plugman.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user stevengill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/236#discussion_r62952050
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/plugman/uninstall.js ---
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ function runUninstallPlatform(actions, platform,
project_dir, plugin_dir,
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#issuecomment-218624176
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user stevengill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439#discussion_r62946762
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/hooks/HooksRunner.js ---
@@ -141,6 +144,23 @@ function runScript(script, context) {
// we assume we should use
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-218623029
How close is this to being able to merge in? @macdonst
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user riknoll opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/439
Improving prepare and build output
The purpose of this PR is to improve the quality and clarity of our logging
(including verbose). Some things I tried to improve:
* Consistency of
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/437
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user qkdreyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/commit/0c61fb097d5f6a317560adbb2165ff916642c5c7#commitcomment-17433959
In cordova-lib/src/cordova/restore-util.js:
In cordova-lib/src/cordova/restore-util.js on line 117:
Github user qkdreyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/commit/0c61fb097d5f6a317560adbb2165ff916642c5c7#commitcomment-17433806
In cordova-lib/src/cordova/restore-util.js:
In cordova-lib/src/cordova/restore-util.js on line 117:
If pluginSpec
Github user codecov-io commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/437#issuecomment-218113832
## [Current coverage][cc-pull] is **80.59%**
> Merging [#437][cc-pull] into [master][cc-base-branch] will not change
coverage
```diff
@@
Github user robertoandrade commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/399#discussion_r62616494
--- Diff: cordova-lib/package.json ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
"underscore": "1.7.0",
"unorm": "1.3.3",
Github user robertoandrade commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/399#discussion_r62616280
--- Diff: cordova-lib/package.json ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
"underscore": "1.7.0",
"unorm": "1.3.3",
Github user stevengill closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#issuecomment-21866
Merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user david-barth-canonical closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/438
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user david-barth-canonical opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/438
Fix plugin platform_www & cordova_plugins.json copy
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user vladimir-kotikov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/437
CB-11200 Bump xcode dependency and update tests to pass
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/MSOpenTech/cordova-lib
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436#issuecomment-217521367
Ok. I've created an issue to track it here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-11219
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436#issuecomment-217513174
@omefire you are correct. That flag seems to be totally broken
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436#issuecomment-217510255
(Though not related to this change) it seems like the ```--force``` flag
wouldn't work as advertised ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436#issuecomment-217510027
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user codecov-io commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436#issuecomment-217507586
## [Current coverage][cc-pull] is **80.71%**
> Merging [#436][cc-pull] into [master][cc-base-branch] will not change
coverage
```diff
@@
GitHub user riknoll opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/436
CB-11134: Removing duplicated warning
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/MSOpenTech/cordova-lib CB-11134
Alternatively you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-217283363
Great! Thanks @jasongin! Merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-217281613
As discussed, I tested this with symbolic links both at the root and in a
subdirectory. It works fine without any special symlink handling in the code.
---
If
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r62252220
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/superspawn.js ---
@@ -22,20 +22,20 @@ var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var _ =
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#issuecomment-217265794
Looking to merge this by EOD today if there are no other concerns.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r62247519
--- Diff: cordova-lib/cordova-lib.js ---
@@ -18,19 +18,35 @@
*/
// For now expose plugman and cordova just as they were in the old repos
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-217236642
@nikhilkh waiting on you. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user macdonst commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-217228255
@ktop thanks for the hint about running `cordova-coho/coho npm-link`. Once
I did I was able to get your code to run. It seems to be working pretty good to
me. So
Github user vladimir-kotikov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/435
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user vladimir-kotikov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/435
Disable e2e to decrease coverage
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vladimir-kotikov/cordova-lib disable_e2e
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#issuecomment-217091665
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#issuecomment-217087853
Made the changes. LMK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r62104877
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/spec/package.json ---
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
--- End diff --
Hmm. Maybe just name it differently. My
Github user stevengill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r62101897
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/spec/package.json ---
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
--- End diff --
I just copy it into temporary tests folder so I can
Github user stevengill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r62100822
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/index.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/**
+ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ or more
Github user stevengill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r62100600
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/index.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/**
+ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ or more
Github user codecov-io commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#issuecomment-216933920
## [Current coverage][cc-pull] is **80.71%**
> Merging [#434][cc-pull] into [master][cc-base-branch] will increase
coverage by **+1.09%**
```diff
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r62068625
--- Diff: cordova-lib/cordova-lib.js ---
@@ -18,19 +18,35 @@
*/
// For now expose plugman and cordova just as they were in the old repos
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r62000656
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/index.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/**
+ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ or more
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r61999817
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/spec/package.json ---
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
--- End diff --
Do we need a separate `package.json` for
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r61998473
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/index.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/**
+ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ or more
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#discussion_r61998292
--- Diff: cordova-fetch/index.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/**
+ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ or more
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#issuecomment-216691951
Hey Everyone,
I think the first implementation of this is ready to hit master behind the
--fetch flag. It includes platform and plugin fetching +
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user ktop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-216629805
@macdonst @purplecabbage
On my other machine (Mac), I see the same behavior that you both were
seeing. I was able to fix it by doing a `cordova-coho/coho
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216628696
Okay, thanks for clarifying. I rescind my objection.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216624907
If you're talking about a source file, then that would change the
last-modified timestamp of the source file, causing it to be newer than the
target file so it
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216619728
Is it possible that a change to a file without affecting file size could go
undetected?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216618237
BTW, I didn't mention above the reason I had to abandon the approach of
checking for exactly-equal modified times. The problem is the OS X filesystem
doesn't
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216617718
@purplecabbage If a hook fails because it expected a file would be
refreshed but it wasn't, then I'd expect the hook to print an error (or stack
trace), so that
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216611405
All right, I think this is the best we can do. The latest logic copies the
file if the source's last-modified time is >= the target's last-modified time,
or if
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216614096
I would not consider that contrived.
This would be an extremely tough issue to find if it happened.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rakatyal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61922956
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/ConfigChanges/ConfigFile.js ---
@@ -17,13 +17,30 @@
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61917593
--- Diff: cordova-common/cordova-common.js ---
@@ -17,26 +17,40 @@
under the License.
*/
-exports = module.exports = {
-
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61917144
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/superspawn.js ---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var _ =
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61915826
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/superspawn.js ---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var _ =
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61915398
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/platforms/PlatformApiPoly.js ---
@@ -474,7 +473,12 @@ function getCreateArgs(destinationDir, projectConfig,
options) {
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61914375
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/ConfigChanges/ConfigFile.js ---
@@ -17,13 +17,30 @@
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61913509
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/superspawn.js ---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var _ =
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61913318
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/ConfigChanges/ConfigFile.js ---
@@ -17,13 +17,30 @@
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61913141
--- Diff: cordova-common/cordova-common.js ---
@@ -17,26 +17,40 @@
under the License.
*/
-exports = module.exports = {
-
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61912923
--- Diff: cordova-common/cordova-common.js ---
@@ -17,26 +17,40 @@
under the License.
*/
-exports = module.exports = {
-
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61912394
--- Diff: cordova-common/cordova-common.js ---
@@ -17,26 +17,40 @@
under the License.
*/
-exports = module.exports = {
-
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434#discussion_r61912274
--- Diff: cordova-common/cordova-common.js ---
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216585668
Well, after further testing I found creation dates don't work reliably due
to some strange behavior on Windows:
GitHub user nikhilkh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/434
CB-11194 Improve cordova load time
I instrumented module load and this change improves our load time by ~50%
(300+ ms) for `cordova build android` on a hello world project. Biggest gains
are
Github user ktop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-216543951
@purplecabbage
My workspace is working off of the master branches with the tools npm
linked.
I modified the plugin.xml of cordova-plugin-device and
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-216424469
@ktop Can you provide the steps you used to verify that this is working
please?
What I did was create a new project, and added the
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-216386608
I too am seeing @macdonst 's issue.
```
...
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-216319068
I updated the PR to use target creation times instead of modified-times. It
works much better: it doesn't require the messy workaround on Windows and
doesn't have
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#discussion_r61665459
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/FileUpdater.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/433#issuecomment-215922979
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user codecov-io commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/407#issuecomment-215918679
## [Current coverage][cc-pull] is **13.19%**
> Merging [#407][cc-pull] into [master][cc-base-branch] will increase
coverage by **-86.81%**
```diff
Github user macdonst commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-215915464
@ktop @riknoll yeah, config.xml should be part of this. Anything in
config.xml should trump whatever is specified in the plugin.xml. If we do modes
then default
Github user nikhilkh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#discussion_r61659743
--- Diff: cordova-common/src/FileUpdater.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-215911697
@nikhilkh As we discussed, this workaround was the best I could find. The
command script approach has similar performance to just copying files via the
node fs
Github user vladimir-kotikov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/433#discussion_r61655336
--- Diff: cordova-lib/spec-cordova/platforms/platforms.spec.js ---
@@ -17,19 +17,25 @@
under the License.
*/
+var fs =
Github user jasongin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/433#issuecomment-215898416
:+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jasongin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/433#discussion_r61653369
--- Diff: cordova-lib/spec-cordova/platforms/platforms.spec.js ---
@@ -17,19 +17,25 @@
under the License.
*/
+var fs =
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-215892244
I would put the mode flag as out-of-scope for now, we can re-asses later if
need be.
I could not get this to work, can you please post instructions
Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-215866756
@ktop config-file wasn't in config.xml before, but we wanted to add it
because the number of config.xml attributes that just edit various native xml
files is
Github user ktop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/432#issuecomment-215857823
@macdonst
I had Edna test the first time around before I opened the PR and she was
able to get it working, so that is weird that it is adding a new element for
Github user nikhilkh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/429#issuecomment-215817627
Simultaneously, lets ask libuv to make the fix for this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
701 - 800 of 3208 matches
Mail list logo