Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser plugin release 6.0.0

2023-11-23 Thread Niklas Merz
The vote has now closed. The results are: Positive Binding Votes: 3 Niklas Merz Norman Breau Bryan Ellis Negative Binding Votes: 0 The vote has passed. On November 21, 2023, Erisu wrote: > I vote +1 > > * Confirmed sigs & hashes with `coho verify-archive` [1] > * Verified sha1s match tags

Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser plugin release 6.0.0

2023-11-21 Thread Bryan Ellis
I vote +1 * Confirmed sigs & hashes with `coho verify-archive` [1] * Verified sha1s match tags with `coho verify-tags` [2] * Re-created archives to ensure contents match release candidate [3] * Verified existence for required Apache files : NOTICE & LICENSE * Verified package.json &

Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser plugin release 6.0.0

2023-11-10 Thread Norman Breau
I vote +1: - Ran NPM test - Ran NPM audit - Verified archive - Verified tags - Ran paramedic on android API 33 On 2023-11-10 6:42 a.m., Niklas Merz wrote: Please review and vote on the release of this plugins release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) The

[VOTE] InAppBrowser plugin release 6.0.0

2023-11-10 Thread Niklas Merz
Please review and vote on the release of this plugins release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) The plugins have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/inappbrowser6/ The packages were published from their corresponding git

RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-04 Thread Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon)
7:45 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release I vote +1. * Verified signatures and hashes * Verified tag * Verified that plugin can be added correctly to blank app * Verified that blank app can be successfully built and ran * Ran smoke testing of mobilespec app

Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-04 Thread Sean Kelly
ft.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:38 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release > > I vote +1. > > * Verified signatures and hashes > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the repo > * Ran plugin auto tests to ensure they are passing

RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-04 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:38 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release I vote +1. * Verified signatures and hashes * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the repo * Ran plugin auto tests to ensure they are passing - Best regards, Vladimir

RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-03 Thread Alexander Sorokin (Akvelon)
(Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 3:18 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release Please review and vote on the InAppBrowser plugin release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https

RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-02 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:44 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release Hey Sean, We only -1 if it is a regression or major bug found. I would say CB-7786 doesn't qualify as either of those. According to ASF

[VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-02 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
Please review and vote on the InAppBrowser plugin release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10505 The plugin has been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10505/ The

Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-02 Thread Sean Kelly
I'd vote no. I'd really like to see CB-7786 get in before the next release. SeanK On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < v-seg...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Please review and vote on the InAppBrowser plugin release > by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS

Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

2016-02-02 Thread Steven Gill
Hey Sean, We only -1 if it is a regression or major bug found. I would say CB-7786 doesn't qualify as either of those. According to ASF policies, only PMC members can vote. I know you have been trying to get someone to review your PR. I'll bug some people tomorrow to see if we can get it