[mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2015 21:39
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Yes, check_reqs logic is still being executed on each build by platform build
script and it's not executed in `platform add`
-
9:04 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Also, Vlad, can you confirm if check_reqs runs on build, or on platform add ?
-Original Message-
From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015
Also, Vlad, can you confirm if check_reqs runs on build, or on platform add ?
-Original Message-
From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:00 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
he project.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Soref [mailto:jso...@blackberry.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:52 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
You mean run but not error?
Because, again, this code *used* to run when platforms were added
April 23, 2015 1:23 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
>
> I think as the first step, it would make sense to run it when platform is
> added
> and project is present. We could change it later to run a system wide check.
> Fo
Message-
From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:28 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Hey, Leo. Thanks for feedback!
I've changed verb name to "requirements" because it loo
Thanks,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:18 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Hey, guys. Have anyone looked at it?
I've made some refactor
t: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:11 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
> >
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > It's great to see this being worked on and discussed. My comments below
> > are mine and mine
dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> It's great to see this being worked on and discussed. My comments below
> are mine and mine alone.
>
> In addition to the code changes, I would have preferred to
..@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:18 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Hey, guys. Have anyone looked at it?
I've made some refactoring to make changes more readable, and updated data
contract between platform's c
04
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
This was only an initial implementation - no pull request has been sent. I
think this is just a way for folks to play with what Vlad has now. I am sure we
will change the verb name before a PR comes in.
---
, April 20, 2015 11:59 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
-1
Didn't everyone agree to call it `cordova doctor` or worst, `cordova
requirements`?
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@mi
ording to
> review comments.
> TBD:
> * move presentation logic from LIB to CLI;
> * refine data format, returned by cordova-lib API
> * add other platforms
> * and more... :)
>
> ---
> Best regards, Vladimir
>
> -Original Message-
> From: P
Message-
From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2015 3:49
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Looks like implementing a global level check_reqs without a project seems
harder, I would sugges
: Josh Soref [mailto:jso...@blackberry.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
We already support:
`cordova build android`
There's no need for the extra `platform` verb..
But,
`cordova build an
hing: check_reqs isn't a .js file yet, as an API, it's
> "check_reqs" (*nix) and "check_reqs" + something from %PATHEXT% (Windows)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com
> ] On Behalf Of
&g
27;t a .js file yet, as an API, it's
"check_reqs" (*nix) and "check_reqs" + something from %PATHEXT% (Windows)
> -Original Message-
> From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Grieve
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 11:00 AM
> To
late)
> which requires the native SDK.
>
> Leo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 6:04 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
>
.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 6:04 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
I think you raise an interesting point on the behavior of check_reqs for
platform that are not yet added.
The options, as you mention are
Question 1
1 - Add the p
edibly ugly thing and doesn't belong in a public facing
interface.
> -Original Message-
> From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI
nd doesn't belong in a public facing
interface.
> -Original Message-
> From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
>
&
not call check_reqs.
>>
>> > -Original Message-----
>> > From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 2:53 PM
>> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>> > Subject: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
&
Absolutely +1
Sent from my iPhone - 4eSPJ
Sacha Herbert
Website:www.sachax.com
Studio: Via A. Bertani, 20a - 00153 Roma
Office: +39 06 933 798 66
Mobile: +39 392 188 0793
Twitter:sachax08
Skype: as3_master
Il presente messaggio e-mail contiene informa
-Original Message-
> > From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 2:53 PM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > One o
call check_reqs.
> -Original Message-
> From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 2:53 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
>
> Hi,
>
> One of the main prob
+1 It sounds like a very good thing to do.
Leo
-Original Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:24 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
Everyone's +1's count! It's the -
platform
> dependency detection?
>
> Kindly,
> Dmitry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 11:56 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
>
> +1
>
al: Expose check_reqs at the CLI level
+1
This will be great for users
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the main problems a lot of developers seem to have is the issue to
> setting up their machines for building various platforms. This came
+1
Sounds great!
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Shazron wrote:
> +1
> This will be great for users
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of the main problems a lot of developers seem to have is the issue
> t
I recently got started with Cordova and this was one of my biggest problems. It
would be even better if the command could provide hints on how to fix the
issues.
Regards,
Taylor Gibb
CEO and Founder - Developer Hut | Microsoft MVP | FoRG
From: Shazron
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2
+1
This will be great for users
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the main problems a lot of developers seem to have is the issue to
> setting up their machines for building various platforms. This came out from
> the Stack overflow survey, an
Hi,
One of the main problems a lot of developers seem to have is the issue to
setting up their machines for building various platforms. This came out from
the Stack overflow survey, and the number of questions on stack overflow,
twitter. Etc.
I thought it would be helpful to have a check_reqs
32 matches
Mail list logo
