Re: Question about the Globalization APi

2013-04-02 Thread Ray Camden
Fair enough. And sorry I missed these replies. But what about my follow up question about the format functions. I asked about this on the Google Group too. Steve Atkin responded that he *thought* the idea was that you would use the result of the format functions in other JS libraries. It would be

Re: Question about the Globalization APi

2013-03-28 Thread Andrew Grieve
Yeah - if they require a call to exec(), then they have to be async. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > Yeah, I too think they could easily be sync methods. The only thing that > I'd be concerned about is if there still is a limitation on iOS where it > can't produce sync

Re: Question about the Globalization APi

2013-03-28 Thread Simon MacDonald
Yeah, I too think they could easily be sync methods. The only thing that I'd be concerned about is if there still is a limitation on iOS where it can't produce sync results. If that is the case I'd stay with a consistent API over sync returns. Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Wed

Re: Question about the Globalization APi

2013-03-27 Thread Marcel Kinard
When I look at all the methods in the Globalization API, they should all execute quickly in a relatively predictable time period. They aren't going off-box and aren't compute-heavy. So to me as a casual observer, having them all run async seems like a bit of overkill. I'm not familiar with the

Question about the Globalization APi

2013-03-25 Thread Ray Camden
This possibly falls into the category of something that should be on the Google group (and actually I did ask there too ;) but I think it also exposes something not documented very well and maybe this discussion can lead to something that can be added to the docs. I've worked with the Globalizatio