RE: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-21 Thread Richard Knoll
[mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:22 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0 Looks like it has been merged. Good to release now? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, that's fine for no

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-21 Thread Steven Gill
;> for the blog post. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9189 >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:22 PM >> To: dev

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-21 Thread Steven Gill
merge that PR. I don't mind writing something up about the changes > for the blog post. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9189 > > Thanks, > Richard > > -Original Message- > From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Steven Gill
gt; > > I have a PR for this: https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/249 > > > > Let's release once we are OK with merging this. > > > > -Nikhil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Joe Bowser
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:36 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0 > > Yes, it probably can. I'm thinking that Google once again put us in > dependency hell with the new NDK functionality, which is why I'm not super > stoked about this

RE: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Nikhil Khandelwal
Let's release once we are OK with merging this. -Nikhil -Original Message- From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:36 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0 Yes, it probably can. I'm thinking that Google once again put

RE: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Nikhil Khandelwal
: Carlos Santana [mailto:csantan...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:00 AM To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0 What you guys think of making MIN SDK VER 15 instead of 14 as the default for this Android@5.1.0 ? We have a couple of plugins that re

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Simon MacDonald
> > > > Overall, we shouldn't require/expect Cordova JS developers to modify > > gradle files. > > > > -Nikhil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Carlos Santana [mailto:csantan...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:00 AM > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Joe Bowser
hould consider fixing it. Sounds like it is a simple fix. Is > > > there JIRA for this? > > > > > > Overall, we shouldn't require/expect Cordova JS developers to modify > > > gradle files. > > > > > > -Nikhil > > > > > > -Origina

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Joe Bowser
a simple fix. Is > there JIRA for this? > > Overall, we shouldn't require/expect Cordova JS developers to modify > gradle files. > > -Nikhil > > -Original Message- > From: Carlos Santana [mailto:csantan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:00 AM > To: dev <

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Simon MacDonald
not work out > of > > > the > > > > box - we should consider fixing it. Sounds like it is a simple fix. > Is > > > > there JIRA for this? > > > > > > > > Overall, we shouldn't require/expect Cordova JS developers to modify > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-19 Thread Carlos Santana
What you guys think of making MIN SDK VER 15 instead of 14 as the default for this Android@5.1.0 ? We have a couple of plugins that required minsdk 15 [1], I also see that phonegap push plugin have problems with min sdk 14 here [2] Instead of anoying user with readme instructions to change it to

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-18 Thread Darryl Pogue
With cordova-android master, the Crosswalk Webview plugin fails to build because gradle was updated and now NDK support has been removed. It can be re-enabled by providing a gradle.properties file, but I'm not sure whether that should be the responsibility of Cordova-Android or the Crosswalk

Re: [DISCUSS] Android@5.1.0

2016-01-18 Thread Joe Bowser
I don't think the gradle build issue should block the release, as annoying as it is, the workaround is literally adding a gradle.properties file with a single line. As far as who owns it, I think Cordova should probably own that, but are there any other plugins that need NDK support? (I just ran