corrected
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> That is wrong and needs to be updated :-)
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>> i think closes thing is here
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugman#configjs-file
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:43 AM
That is wrong and needs to be updated :-)
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
> i think closes thing is here
>
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugman#configjs-file
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Marcel Kinard wrote:
>
>> I don't see this workflow documented anywhere,
i think closes thing is here
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugman#configjs-file
On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Marcel Kinard wrote:
> I don't see this workflow documented anywhere, or am I missing it?
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:56 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
>
>> I agree that they should be en
I don't see this workflow documented anywhere, or am I missing it?
On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:56 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> I agree that they should be encouraged.
>
> configuration is stored in plugman (even for cordova-cli) and one can
> easily set a registry with `plugman config set registry
> http:
Hey Anis,
plugman command line is better than what I have been doing :)
I failed to find the multiple registry issue. Can you forward it if you
find it.
Of course it is up to the provider but does that mean there is no curation
and cordova.io registry may carry plugins that has never worked?
--
Go
I agree that they should be encouraged.
configuration is stored in plugman (even for cordova-cli) and one can
easily set a registry with `plugman config set registry
http://newregistry' (exactly like NPM).
There were discussions about adding multiple registry support as well
as a fallback to the
Should 3rd party plugin registries be encouraged or not? I personally would
like to see more of them but I do not think we are technically supporting
them enough. Introducing a new registry to plugman/cli is done through
config.js. I guess the first problem is that "it is done through config.js"
ra
I started work on an updated UI for the cordova registry yesterday,
coincidentally.
-j
On 13-10-11 5:04 PM, "Steven Gill" wrote:
>Maybe we should contact him to help out with our official registry! We
>could use some UX
>
>
>On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Shazron wrote:
>
>> Yeah especially
Seems quite useful actually. He could support versions via git tags (if he
added that in, plugman already supports it)... Probably the main difference
(besides he's scraped github), is that he's not hosting tgz files.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Wowzers! That's a lot
Wowzers! That's a lot of xml files!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jesse wrote:
> There are 4021 xml files on github with the namespace :
> http://cordova.apache.org/ns/plugins/1.0
>
>
> https://github.com/search?l=xml&q=http%3A%2F%2Fcordova.apache.org%2Fns%2Fplugins%2F1.0&ref=advsearch&type=
Maybe we should contact him to help out with our official registry! We
could use some UX
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Yeah especially since I'm sure none of us submitted anything he's just
> seeding stuff more like
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jesse wrote:
>
There are 4021 xml files on github with the namespace :
http://cordova.apache.org/ns/plugins/1.0
https://github.com/search?l=xml&q=http%3A%2F%2Fcordova.apache.org%2Fns%2Fplugins%2F1.0&ref=advsearch&type=Code
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Yeah esp
Yeah especially since I'm sure none of us submitted anything he's just
seeding stuff more like
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jesse wrote:
> and apparently I have 2 ... this is going to confuse people, since most of
> them are just different forks of the same repos.
>
> @purplecabbage
> r
It's probably the Firefox OS plugin stuff
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jesse wrote:
> herm wong has 3 plugins up there! wtf?
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
>
> > I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
> > r
Definitely looks better and it reports engine versions! ;)
hint hint https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4896
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
> references git URLs. There is no notion of version so you'd h
and apparently I have 2 ... this is going to confuse people, since most of
them are just different forks of the same repos.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jesse wrote:
> herm wong has 3 plugins up there! wtf?
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2
herm wong has 3 plugins up there! wtf?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
> references git URLs. There is no notion of version so you'd have to
> pull from master.
> It definitely looks
I welcome the initiative. However, If I am not mistaken it only
references git URLs. There is no notion of version so you'd have to
pull from master.
It definitely looks better than plugins.cordova.io though xD!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Saw this from a comment on one of m
Saw this from a comment on one of my blog posts:
http://www.plugreg.com/
19 matches
Mail list logo
