Re: Lounge clustering framework

2009-03-25 Thread Shaun Lindsay
Alright, we got legal approval to release all the Lounge code, so I did a bunch of cleaning up (removing Meebo-specific pathnames, moving python modules out of our Meebo libraries and into a lounge specific module, etc) and put it all up on google code. http://code.google.com/p/couchdb-lounge/ Si

Re: Restricting user interactions to a single document -- was [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Tim Parkin
Damien Katz wrote: > You could help by updating the wiki documentation to make this clearer. > Multiple places if necessary. > Hi Damien, Could you help by taking a look at the issue I'm trying to work around. I'd love to work out a way of dealing with this without having to patch CouchDB (whi

Re: Restricting user interactions to a single document -- was [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Tim Parkin
Damien Katz wrote: >> The upshot appears to be that CouchDB is limited to only changing a >> single document at a time through a user interface (unless you want to >> add lots of work to handle conflicts).. Could I have a confirmation of >> this so I can blog about it. > > That pretty much true, C

Re: Restricting user interactions to a single document -- was [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread David Pratt
Hi. I am equally concerned about the issue Tim has raised. I am disappointed because I was also counting on the functionality that couch possessed going forward. We are loosing something here, though it may not appear on the surface as being that important (possibly because the apps with th

Re: Restricting user interactions to a single document -- was [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Damien Katz
On Mar 25, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Tim Parkin wrote: Chris Anderson wrote: -- aa -- I think I understand the issue. I think there are two ways to approach a solution. One is to confine end-user updates to a single key. This approach is the classic model for key/value stores. Pretty unfeasible

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Volker Mische
Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. > > All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for > release. > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts > so > that any critical issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Ben Damman
I successfully installed from trunk this morning on OS X 10.4 -- nice work guys. I just subscribed to dev this morning, so I don't think my vote counts for much but... I think you've got a viable release for 0.9. Kudos, Ben Damman "Wannabe Erlang Developer"

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. > > All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for > release. > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts

wiki commit mails

2009-03-25 Thread Volker Mische
Hi, as mails from wiki changes are still sent to couchdb-comm...@incubator.apache.org. I wondered what the problem is. On IRC I got the answer that no one knows how to fix it. This page should give a hint where the config settings are: http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinPatch/CommitMails Cheers, Volker

Multi Document Rollback Strategies (was Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release)

2009-03-25 Thread Chris Anderson
Moving this to it's own thread to avoid hijacking the VOTE thread. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Tim Parkin wrote: >> Chris Anderson wrote: I'd be interested in knowing what happened to the community discussion around the re

Re: Restricting user interactions to a single document -- was [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Jason Smith
Tim Parkin wrote: The upshot appears to be that CouchDB is limited to only changing a single document at a time through a user interface (unless you want to add lots of work to handle conflicts).. Could I have a confirmation of this so I can blog about it. It's a pretty fundamental restriction an

Re: Restricting user interactions to a single document -- was [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Tim Parkin
Chris Anderson wrote: -- aa -- > > I think I understand the issue. I think there are two ways to approach > a solution. One is to confine end-user updates to a single key. This > approach is the classic model for key/value stores. Pretty unfeasible I would think.. > If your domain requires that

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Noah Slater
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:44:07PM +0100, Chris Anderson wrote: > I think I understand the issue. I think there are two ways to approach > a solution. One is to confine end-user updates to a single key. This > approach is the classic model for key/value stores. Can we move this off to a different

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Paul Carey
> Happy voting, > > -- > Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater +1 All green from the RelaxDB test suite except for CouchDB-292 which is fix for 0.10. Paul

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Mark Gallop
On 24/3/09 11:00 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Hello, This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for release. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Chris Anderson
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Tim Parkin wrote: > Chris Anderson wrote: >>> I'd be interested in knowing what happened to the community discussion >>> around the removal of the bulk_docs 'feature'? I've tried to raise this a >>> couple of times but had little reaction. Am I right in understand

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Sven Helmberger
Noah Slater schrieb: Hello, This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for release. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved be

Re: server crash when compacting empty database

2009-03-25 Thread Wout Mertens
Confirmed. However, here's a related one: net-couchdb's compacting test makes CouchDB crash as well. I don't have time right now to make a minimal test case, but this is the code: # insert a few documents and delete one my $bacon = $couch->insert( { b => 'bacon'

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Tim Parkin
Chris Anderson wrote: >> I'd be interested in knowing what happened to the community discussion >> around the removal of the bulk_docs 'feature'? I've tried to raise this a >> couple of times but had little reaction. Am I right in understanding this >> lack of reaction as meaning there is going to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Chris Anderson
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. > > All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for > release. > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts >

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-217) Store Revision of Attachments

2009-03-25 Thread Chris Anderson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Anderson updated COUCHDB-217: --- Fix Version/s: 0.10 > Store Revision of Attachments > - > >

Re: Where to add documentation for bulk updates

2009-03-25 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On 25 Mar 2009, at 09:46, Brian Candler wrote: I'm not sure who will use the new "all_or_nothing":true, or why. Presumably it's possible to build some useful transactional semantics on top of this, with care. Maybe we will have to buy the book to find out :-) Hehe, you can read the book w

Re: Where to add documentation for bulk updates

2009-03-25 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Brian, first, thanks a lot for helping out with CouchDB, driving discussions and documentation, your work is highly appreciated. On 25 Mar 2009, at 09:46, Brian Candler wrote: This is where I think the introductory material on couchdb.apache.org does CouchDB a big disservice by overhyp

Re: Fwd: GSoC and CouchDB Windows porting

2009-03-25 Thread Alexander Chekmarev
Thank you, Mark, for your help and useful links. I will continue working on it and post results later. 2009/3/25 Mark Hammond > On 25/03/2009 1:25 AM, Alexander Chekmarev wrote: > >> I am a student just interested in CouchDB architecture and, what is more >> excellent, that is written,commonly,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Sven Helmberger
Jan Lehnardt schrieb: Yes, 0.9 is not an API-freeze release. Although we planned for it, it was not feasible to hold back the release any longer in favour of a fixed API which is why a future pre 1.0 version will get the feature freeze. I think this is a useful feature and we should have it f

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On 25 Mar 2009, at 09:48, Sven Helmberger wrote: Noah Slater schrieb: Hello, This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for release. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release art

Re: Where to add documentation for bulk updates

2009-03-25 Thread Jason Smith
Brian Candler wrote: However, performing this resolution on every single read is a complete PITA for the client side to implement, and easy to forget. To centralise and enforce this you really need some sort of proxy layer between the client and the database so that every doc read and view read h

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Sven Helmberger
Noah Slater schrieb: Hello, This is the first release after graduating the ASF Incubator. All 0.9.0 blockers have been resolved and I would like call a vote for release. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved be

Re: Where to add documentation for bulk updates

2009-03-25 Thread Brian Candler
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:03:55AM -0700, David Van Couvering wrote: > Thanks for fixing this, Brian. I'm not sure I'm totally happy with these > semantics. Unless I am missing something (more than possible as I'm still > learning CouchDB), for a bulk update with N documents, you would have to do

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.0 release

2009-03-25 Thread Brian Candler
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:31:32AM -0500, Zachary Zolton wrote: > To any Ubuntu users, are you all still just downloading the Erlang > source from erlang.org, or is there a pre-compiled binary available > somehow? I am using Ubuntu Hardy, but with the Erlang packages from Intrepid, using the instr