[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-432) Upgrade Futon's json2.js and jquery.js

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Davies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755457#action_12755457 ] Jason Davies commented on COUCHDB-432: -- Any objections to me committing this? Mr.

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Robert Newson
sounds good, assuming the deprecation of _all_docs_by_seq is called out quite clearly (its removal on trunk breaks couchdb-lucene so I've added a note to my README). B. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Hi Noah. thanks for taking the time! On 15 Sep 2009,

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-497) fix attachments with an undefined Content-Length header and no TE

2009-09-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benoit Chesneau updated COUCHDB-497: Attachment: fix_put_attachment2.patch attachment with test for empty attachment. I can't

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Hey, I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. Thanks, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater pending resolution of #497,

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Noah Slater
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:05:19PM +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote: pending resolution of #497, +1 for me. Will someone please reply to this thread when this is fixed then please? -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater

[jira] Closed: (COUCHDB-497) fix attachments with an undefined Content-Length header and no TE

2009-09-15 Thread Jan Lehnardt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Lehnardt closed COUCHDB-497. Resolution: Fixed Fixed in trunk in r815308 and in 0.10.0 fix attachments with an undefined

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-106) check for Erlang OpenSSL support in configure

2009-09-15 Thread Kev Jackson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kev Jackson updated COUCHDB-106: Attachment: check_crypto.patch Patch to configure.ac to check that Erlang has been installed with

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Trevor Turk
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. I'm not sure that this is a blocker, but I was wondering if the following fix would be in the

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Trevor, On 15 Sep 2009, at 15:26, Trevor Turk wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. I'm not sure that this is a

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On 15 Sep 2009, at 15:26, Trevor Turk wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. I'm not sure that this is a blocker, but I

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Curt Arnold
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote: Hey, I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. Thanks, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater I'd really like to see

Re: Per-DB Auth Ideas and Proposal

2009-09-15 Thread Curt Arnold
On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Jason Davies wrote: On 14 Sep 2009, at 06:12, Chris Anderson wrote: Heh - the easiest programming model for security is to forgo server-side views altogether, so that client interact with the server through replication. Then you could handle read security with

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote: This specifically affects threadsafe builds of spidermonkey. if spidermonkey rely on external nspr, nspr should be compiled threadsafe too. It could be the problem. - benoît

Re: Per-DB Auth Ideas and Proposal

2009-09-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Jason Davies ja...@jasondavies.com wrote: Hi all, Thanks for all the excellent responses! With Chris Anderson's simplest thing that could possibly work idea in mind, here's a quick summary of what I plan to implement as a first cut.  I've taken ideas from

[jira] Reopened: (COUCHDB-449) Turn off delayed commits by default

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Anderson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Anderson reopened COUCHDB-449: As we're currently discussing this on IRC, I should reopen the ticket. In a simple (naive

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-449) Turn off delayed commits by default

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Anderson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Anderson updated COUCHDB-449: --- Attachment: slow.rb here's my benchmark script Turn off delayed commits by default

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Joseph Davis
Afaik all nspr builds are threadsafe or at least default to it. I might be assuming too much of the SM build system but one would hope it'd detect an incompatible nspr. On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Paul Davis

Re: svn commit: r815404 - /couchdb/branches/0.10.x/etc/couchdb/default.ini.tpl.in

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Anderson
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 15 Sep 2009, at 19:09, jch...@apache.org wrote: Author: jchris Date: Tue Sep 15 17:09:22 2009 New Revision: 815404 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815404view=rev Log: changed default for 0.10 to

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Paul Joseph Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote: Afaik all nspr builds are threadsafe or at least default to it. I might be assuming too much of the SM build system but one would hope it'd detect an incompatible nspr. Well I remembr time where the problem

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Scott Shumaker
Is there a replacement for all_docs_by_seq? On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Paul Joseph Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote: Afaik all nspr builds are threadsafe or at least default to it. I might be assuming too much of the SM build system but one would hope it'd detect an incompatible

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Anderson
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Scott Shumaker sshuma...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a replacement for all_docs_by_seq? all_docs_by_seq will be in 0.10, but deprecated. most of it's functionality is available on the 0.10 _changes feed but all of it's functionality will be moved to _changes for

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Anderson
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Hey, I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. This morning I reopened http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-449 by committing

possible bug: http keep alive fails, new connection needed for every request

2009-09-15 Thread thomas hallaran
Hi all, We are using couchdb in production and have come across what appears to be a bug in the HTTP implementation. Apparently http keep alive requests are not correctly supported by couchdb. This problem has been verified for both couchdb .10 a running on ubuntu with erlang 13.b1 and couchdb

[jira] Created: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB - Key: COUCHDB-504 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-504 Project: CouchDB Issue Type: Bug Components: HTTP Interface Affects Versions: 0.10

Re: possible bug: http keep alive fails, new connection needed for every request

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:33 PM, thomas hallaran thalla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We are using couchdb in production and have come across what appears to be a bug in the HTTP implementation. Apparently http keep alive requests are not correctly supported by couchdb. This problem has been

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Volker Mische volker.mis...@gmail.com wrote: Chris Anderson wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Scott Shumaker sshuma...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a replacement for all_docs_by_seq? all_docs_by_seq will be in 0.10, but deprecated. most of it's

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755734#action_12755734 ] Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-504: ---

Re: [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Adam Kocoloski
There's no keep-alive in HTTP/1.0 ... Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: [

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-448) Support Gzip encoding for replicating over slow connections

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Davies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755747#action_12755747 ] Jason Davies commented on COUCHDB-448: -- Note to self or whoever implements this: the

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-448) Support Gzip encoding for replicating over slow connections

2009-09-15 Thread Damien Katz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755753#action_12755753 ] Damien Katz commented on COUCHDB-448: - Ideally we'll store attachments gzipped, and

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Christopher Lenz
On 15.09.2009, at 16:02, Curt Arnold wrote: On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote: I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. I'd really like to see

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On 16 Sep 2009, at 00:30, Christopher Lenz wrote: On 15.09.2009, at 16:02, Curt Arnold wrote: On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote: I plan on cutting the 0.10 release for a vote today. I would like to collect any objections now before I go through the motions. I'd really like

[jira] Closed: (COUCHDB-257) HTTP caching headers don't provide expected behaviour

2009-09-15 Thread Jan Lehnardt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Lehnardt closed COUCHDB-257. Resolution: Won't Fix From dev@: Christopher Lenz: This is a somewhat misleading description;

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-502) Large objects/text crash Futon

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Davies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Davies updated COUCHDB-502: - Component/s: (was: JavaScript View Server) Administration Console

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-502) Large objects/text crash Futon

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Davies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Davies updated COUCHDB-502: - Attachment: test.json Test JSON data. To reproduce, copy and paste its contents into a field

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-502) Large objects/text crash Futon

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Davies (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Davies updated COUCHDB-502: - Attachment: (was: test.json) Large objects/text crash Futon

Re: [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Davis
Both MochiWeb and http://www.io.com/~maus/HttpKeepAlive.html think there is Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.0. And I'm guessing a great many clients do as well. Granted its by convention and not part of the spec, do we kill the possibility or adhere to convention. Seeing as Mochiweb already tries I would

Re: svn commit: r815404 - /couchdb/branches/0.10.x/etc/couchdb/default.ini.tpl.in

2009-09-15 Thread Robert Newson
A durability matrix that lays out all the possible combinations of headers and behavior would be a good place to start. Something that clearly states when data is synced to disk (and what fsync does on different OS'es) would be an excellent deliverable in its own right. I don't know all the spots

Re: [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Robert Newson
Seeing as ApacheBench does it, and it's a very useful benchmarking tool, supporting Connection: Keep-Alive for HTTP/1.0 requests doesn't seem too awful. Yes, it's not in the spec at all, so it's technically wrong, but whatever. I think we should consider a Connection: Keep-Alive header in an

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-448) Support Gzip encoding for replicating over slow connections

2009-09-15 Thread Robert Newson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755798#action_12755798 ] Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-448: --- A useful strategy is to compress the first

Re: [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Adam Kocoloski
Heh, I stand corrected. +1 on the path forward. I guess its just a matter of adding Connection: Keep-Alive to the response headers. Adam On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Paul Davis wrote: Both MochiWeb and http://www.io.com/~maus/HttpKeepAlive.html think there is Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.0. And

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Bob Dionne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bob Dionne updated COUCHDB-504: --- Attachment: couch_httpd_hack.patch this patch to send_json puts Connection : Keep-Alive into the

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Curt Arnold
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Christopher Lenz wrote: This is a somewhat misleading description; it's not the lack of an Expires header on CouchDB responses that results in incorrect caching, it's a (really ugly) bug in the XMLHttpRequest implementation of IE6 that does this. As far as I

Re: [jira] Closed: (COUCHDB-495) Make views twice as fast

2009-09-15 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
Nice work guys! I don't really understand (yet) everything that you're talking about here, but the issue title sounds really great! Also very glad to hear that ICU was not really a bottleneck for collation. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Damien Katz (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:     [

Re: POST/PUT on _show vs POST/PUT on _update + GET on _show

2009-09-15 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Vlad GURDIGA gurd...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Jan for the comment. On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 13 Sep 2009, at 19:37, Vlad GURDIGA wrote:

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Christopher Lenz wrote: This is a somewhat misleading description; it's not the lack of an Expires header on CouchDB responses that results in incorrect caching, it's a (really ugly) bug in

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Joseph Davis updated COUCHDB-504: -- Attachment: COUCHDB-504.patch This version is a bit cleaner and fairly more specific

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-504) HTTP/1.1 keep alive fails with AB

2009-09-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benoit Chesneau updated COUCHDB-504: Attachment: couchdb_httpd_504.patch patch like davisp one but using

Re: Call for objections releasing 0.10

2009-09-15 Thread Curt Arnold
On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Paul Davis wrote: Regardless of browser support, the first question should always be weather we can avoid hacks specific to a user agent. Unless you can show that there's a case where its absolutely impossible for a significant user agent to configure itself to