Re: make check fails

2009-11-16 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm >> wrong, and please advise. >> >> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173 >> >> If

Re: make check fails

2009-11-16 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm >>> wrong, and please advise. >>> >>> Here is

inner mechanics question

2009-11-16 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
Hello! Again, I'm not sure whether it's a couchdb-dev@ or couchdb-user@ question. I wonder how _shows, _lists, _updates (and maybe others?) couch-side code is executed. Is there a single couchjs loaded on couch start and it is fed all the functions that are called thought URLs or there is a separ

Re: inner mechanics question

2009-11-16 Thread Adam Kocoloski
On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > Hello! > > Again, I'm not sure whether it's a couchdb-dev@ or couchdb-user@ question. > > I wonder how _shows, _lists, _updates (and maybe others?) couch-side > code is executed. Is there a single couchjs loaded on couch start and > it is fed al

Re: inner mechanics question

2009-11-16 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> Again, I'm not sure whether it's a couchdb-dev@ or couchdb-user@ question. >> >> I wonder how _shows, _lists, _updates (and maybe others?) couch-side >> code is executed. Is

Re: inner mechanics question

2009-11-16 Thread Adam Kocoloski
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote: >> On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> Again, I'm not sure whether it's a couchdb-dev@ or couchdb-user@ question. >>> >>> I wonder how _shows, _lists, _u

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-16 Thread Filipe Manana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778336#action_12778336 ] Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-558: --- Hum, The mochiweb_multipart:parse_headers

RE: Windows service

2009-11-16 Thread Brunjes, Lee (lmb7s)
This seems like the best option. Works on everything I have tried it on. -Lee -Original Message- From: Juhani Ränkimies [mailto:juh...@juranki.com] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 2:37 AM To: dev@couchdb.apache.org; mhamm...@skippinet.com.au Subject: Re: Windows service On Sun, Nov 15,

Re: Fwd: link: CouchDB almost a GNOME dependency during this cycle.

2009-11-16 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:15 -0800, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what are those js engines? > gjs and, iirc, libseed. You can find both in the GNOME git server (http://git.gnome.org)

Re: link: CouchDB almost a GNOME dependency during this cycle.

2009-11-16 Thread Chris Anderson
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2009, at 23:05, Chris Anderson wrote: > >> Using a different engine ought to be trivial. Thanks for keeping us in the >> loop. > > What about the curl bindings? > They aren't strictly necessary unless you want to run the headless t

Re: make check fails

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: Hello, I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778449#action_12778449 ] Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-558: --- Filipe, decode_packet looks like i

Re: link: CouchDB almost a GNOME dependency during this cycle.

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >> On 12 Nov 2009, at 23:05, Chris Anderson wrote: >> >>> Using a different engine ought to be trivial. Thanks for keeping us in the >>> loop. >> >> What about the curl bindings? >> > >

Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, Trying to build the 0.9.x branch on Debian unstable gives the following error: couch_js.c: In function 'main': couch_js.c:1218: error: 'JSOPTION_NATIVE_BRANCH_CALLBACK' undeclared (first use in this function) couch_js.c:1218: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hey, > > Trying to build the 0.9.x branch on Debian unstable gives the following > error: > > couch_js.c: In function 'main': > couch_js.c:1218: error: 'JSOPTION_NATIVE_BRANCH_CALLBACK' undeclared (first > use in this function) > couch_js.c:121

Re: link: CouchDB almost a GNOME dependency during this cycle.

2009-11-16 Thread Noah Slater
On 16 Nov 2009, at 19:01, Paul Davis wrote: As soon as I commit the couchjs refactor it should be extremely easy (relatively speaking) to replace the HTTP interface with any sort of bindings that are desired. I made sure to have the HTTP interface enabled by a single function call so that the c

Re: link: CouchDB almost a GNOME dependency during this cycle.

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2009, at 19:01, Paul Davis wrote: > >> As soon as I commit the couchjs refactor it should be extremely easy >> (relatively speaking) to replace the HTTP interface with any sort of >> bindings that are desired. I made sure to have th

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Noah Slater
On 16 Nov 2009, at 19:27, Paul Davis wrote: What version of Spidermonkey are you running? 1.9.1.4 The 0.10.x branch has been patched to work with newer versions. Is this something we should patch, or should I just have the check say "Your version of spidermonkey is too new" or something els

[jira] Created: (COUCHDB-569) Typo when requesting a type of group that is invalid

2009-11-16 Thread David Coallier (JIRA)
Typo when requesting a type of group that is invalid Key: COUCHDB-569 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-569 Project: CouchDB Issue Type: Bug Components: Database

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-569) Typo when requesting a type of group that is invalid

2009-11-16 Thread David Coallier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Coallier updated COUCHDB-569: --- Attachment: COUCHDB-569.patch Simply fix it in 2 places. > Typo when requesting a type of g

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2009, at 19:27, Paul Davis wrote: > >> What version of Spidermonkey are you running? > > 1.9.1.4 > >> The 0.10.x branch has been patched to >> work with newer versions. Is this something we should patch, or should >> I just have the

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Adam Kocoloski
On Nov 16, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > I was wondering idly the other day if there's actually been any backports to > 0.9.x since the 0.9.1 release. Just one -- I patched the replicator to fix the list_to_existing_atom bug that made it impossible for 0.9.x <-> 0.10.x replications to

[jira] Resolved: (COUCHDB-569) Typo when requesting a type of group that is invalid

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Joseph Davis resolved COUCHDB-569. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Paul Joseph Davis Applied in 880951. > Typo when

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Noah Slater
On 16 Nov 2009, at 20:25, Paul "Smartass" Davis wrote: Noah "Awesome" Slater, 1.9.1.4? That's quite interesting. Because 1.8.1 isn't out yet. And Spidermonkey doesn't use a 4 digit numbering scheme. SpiderMonkey is part of the XULRunner package: "XULRunner 1.9.1 has been released and can

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > On 16 Nov 2009, at 20:25, Paul "Smartass" Davis wrote: > >> Noah "Awesome" Slater, >> >> 1.9.1.4? That's quite interesting. Because 1.8.1 isn't out yet. And >> Spidermonkey doesn't use a 4 digit numbering scheme. > > SpiderMonkey is part of the

Re: Windows service

2009-11-16 Thread Mark Hammond
On 15/11/2009 6:36 PM, Juhani Ränkimies wrote: On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Mark Hammond wrote: erts-5.7.3\bin\erlsrv.exe add CouchDBProd -i couchdbprod -w D:\couch_service\prod\bin -ar "-sasl errlog_type error -s couch" sc.exe config couchdbprod obj= .\\imaginarycouchdbuser password= even

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-16 Thread Filipe Manana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778587#action_12778587 ] Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-558: --- Definitely, erlang:decode_packet/3 works fi

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778630#action_12778630 ] Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-558: --- That header parsing makes me feel a

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Noah Slater
On 16 Nov 2009, at 21:38, Paul Davis wrote: I was wondering idly the other day if there's actually been any backports to 0.9.x since the 0.9.1 release. What happened when the 0 9 1 release? People rejoiced. You realise that the rest of the email was pasted directly from M-x doctor, th

Re: Problem releasing 0.9.2

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2009, at 21:38, Paul Davis wrote: > I was wondering idly the other day if there's actually been any backports to 0.9.x since the 0.9.1 release. >>> >>> What happened when the 0 9 1 release? >> >> People rejoiced. > >

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-16 Thread Filipe Manana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778746#action_12778746 ] Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-558: --- I even prefer: %% @spec to_mochiweb_header

Re: make check fails

2009-11-16 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis >>> wrote: On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > Hello,