[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849583#action_12849583
]
Jamie Talbot commented on COUCHDB-523:
--
I should mention that the supplied patch allo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849569#action_12849569
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-709:
Looks good to me.
The asynchronous shutd
Oh, BTW, I meant to +1 back then... Passes the tests for my app (^_-)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849558#action_12849558
]
Chris Anderson commented on COUCHDB-709:
ok, Jira seems unable to accept my patch
Restart actually restarts the server
Key: COUCHDB-709
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-709
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Database Core
Report
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> Can an
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:33, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> so i don't get the stuff I had yesterday with previous artefact.
>> However changes tests only work when I launch it alone. I supposed
>> it's due to slowness of macbook IO
Can an
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:33, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> so i don't get the stuff I had yesterday with previous artefact.
> However changes tests only work when I launch it alone. I supposed
> it's due to slowness of macbook IO. Others tests are ok. make check is
> ok
Can you or anyone els
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>
On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote:
> Anyway,
On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes since the last round:
>
> * Build system now supports OS X for release preparation.
>
+1 on this release.
All tests pass for me on
On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
>> Brian, Benoit, can you both double check and do a clean-slate installation
>> into a new --prefix if you haven't done so?
>
> Unfortunately the original box I was using is now powered down until next
> week.
>
> I have done a test on anothe
> Brian, Benoit, can you both double check and do a clean-slate installation
> into a new --prefix if you haven't done so?
Unfortunately the original box I was using is now powered down until next
week.
I have done a test on another box (Ubuntu Karmic, x86_64). The test suite
under Firefox gave
Mac OS X 10.5.8
Erlang R13B02
Firefox 3.6.2
Safari 4.0.4
make check: OK
Passed unit tests for my internal Couch 0.10 application.
Firefox browser test failure:
content_negotiation
Assertion failed: expected 'text/plain;charset=utf-8', got 'application/json'
Safari browser test error:
list_views
On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:47, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Sorry for the hassle. Just wanted to make sure I understood and that
> I'm also following the same process.
Again, the ASF is all about transparency, if there's anything unclear
to anyone here, you shouldn't hesitate to ask for clarification
Sorry for the hassle. Just wanted to make sure I understood and that
I'm also following the same process.
Thanks again!
Chris
Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:28, Christopher Brown wrote:
>
>> Can I ask a process point here?
>
> Of course, any time.
>
>> I'm seeing people saying "I
On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:28, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Can I ask a process point here?
Of course, any time.
> I'm seeing people saying "I may have missed a commit" and being asked to
> do a clean install to run these tests, which makes me wonder if we are
> all testing the same thing. When Noah
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Can I ask a process point here?
>
> I'm seeing people saying "I may have missed a commit" and being asked to
> do a clean install to run these tests, which makes me wonder if we are
> all testing the same thing. When Noah sends out mail
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>
On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote:
> Anyway,
On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote:
>>>
Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibl
Can I ask a process point here?
I'm seeing people saying "I may have missed a commit" and being asked to
do a clean install to run these tests, which makes me wonder if we are
all testing the same thing. When Noah sends out mail saying "these are
the artifacts to vote on", is everyone ensuring th
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibly
>>> something to do with my setup, and browser-based tests are
On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote:
>
>> Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibly
>> something to do with my setup, and browser-based tests are fragile anyway.
>> Hence I'm not going to vote against the
Mac OS X 10.6.2 (10C540)
make check: ok
browser test suite: ok (using Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6)
+1
On 23.03.2010, at 19:49, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, secon
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:04:32PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I reported the same yesterday. Had to remove the db folder and
> relaunch the tests. Something happend in last 2 weeks about these
> tests.
Certainly my system has been through some odd versions of trunk, but doesn't
the test suite
Fwiw:
Ubuntu Karmic
Erlang R13B03
Ok + 1
--
David Coallier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim updated COUCHDB-708:
Description:
Newlines in document locations break header parsing. Potential header injection
issues?
$ curl -X D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849159#action_12849159
]
Matt Goodall commented on COUCHDB-411:
--
Looks like this is still happening or has bee
Newlines in document locations break header parsing
---
Key: COUCHDB-708
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-708
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Database C
writes are also concurrent in a sense, though only one process is
writing to the .couch file. If I send a 100 mib attachment and you
send one at the same time, then chunks from each of our attachments
are written to disk as they are being sent. We both get a 201 at about
the same time.
B.
On Wed,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
>> Now installs fine under Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) i386, once I'd remembered to
>> rm -rf /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib.
>>
>> However, the in-browser test suite gave me various interm
i think this is right place)
2010/3/24 Robert Newson
> There are numerous ways that attachment retrieval performance can be
> improved, I'm just explaining why you're seeing the numbers you
> reported.
>
> Turning off chunking would also be a code change, one that I don't
> expect will make it i
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
> Now installs fine under Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) i386, once I'd remembered to
> rm -rf /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib.
>
> However, the in-browser test suite gave me various intermittent errors.
>
> Quite consistently I could get this one, eve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849133#action_12849133
]
Nikita Nemkin commented on COUCHDB-523:
---
This is a very useful feature when indexing
On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote:
> Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibly
> something to do with my setup, and browser-based tests are fragile anyway.
> Hence I'm not going to vote against the release. It's a 0 from me.
Not true, you are the secon
Now installs fine under Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) i386, once I'd remembered to
rm -rf /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib.
However, the in-browser test suite gave me various intermittent errors.
Quite consistently I could get this one, even after disabling firefox
extensions(*):
reader_acl error
34 matches
Mail list logo
