<3
On 21.06.2012, at 22:25, Noah Slater wrote:
> I am publicly taking ownership of this project, and will run point on it.
>
> I've not contributed code to CouchDB for a while, and my free personal time
> is scarce, but I am in the best position to do this work. I know Autotools
> and DocBook
I am publicly taking ownership of this project, and will run point on it.
I've not contributed code to CouchDB for a while, and my free personal time is
scarce, but I am in the best position to do this work. I know Autotools and
DocBook very well, and have integrated them in the past.
On 21 J
On Jun 16, 2012, at 18:45 , Noah Slater wrote:
> (The last one needs to be fleshed out, a little...)
I made some refinements:
- all work happens in branches (bugfix/feature branches).
- added a link to a [MERGE] mail template:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Merge_Request
- no need to call a
Hi,
> This has nothing to do with docbook, we generate HTML and we can link to that
> in Futon, I don't think we want to generate the Futon-docs part in docbook,
> but happy to be proven wrong. I think it'd be easer to make a docs.html in
> futon that keeps the header and sidebar and just shows
On Jun 21, 2012, at 17:01 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 16:55 , Simon Metson wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>> Sorry, my bad, it actually ships with Macs as far as I can tell. I updated
>>> the README.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Cool.
>>> Did you mean to do `make dev && utils/run` or is `./bin/couch
On Jun 21, 2012, at 16:55 , Simon Metson wrote:
> Hey,
>> Sorry, my bad, it actually ships with Macs as far as I can tell. I updated
>> the README.
>>
>>
>
> Cool.
>> Did you mean to do `make dev && utils/run` or is `./bin/couchdb` done in a
>> `make install` target?
> It was done in the ma
Hey,
> Sorry, my bad, it actually ships with Macs as far as I can tell. I updated
> the README.
>
>
Cool.
> Did you mean to do `make dev && utils/run` or is `./bin/couchdb` done in a
> `make install` target?
It was done in the make install target. make dev && utils/run works.
>
> > * did a
Thanks :)
On Jun 21, 2012, at 16:40 , Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Done ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Fedor.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:29 , Fedor Indutny wrote:
>>
>>> Speaking of that, can I ask to add me to THANKS file? ;)
>>
>> Done, can
Done ;)
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:29 , Fedor Indutny wrote:
>
> > Speaking of that, can I ask to add me to THANKS file? ;)
>
> Done, can you in turn close your PR on GitHub? :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > F
Github user indutny closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/21
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:29 , Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Speaking of that, can I ask to add me to THANKS file? ;)
Done, can you in turn close your PR on GitHub? :)
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> Cheers,
> Fedor.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2012, at 22
On Jun 21, 2012, at 16:18 , Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback, Paul.
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2012, at 15:16 , Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>>> I did some poking through of that docs branch the other day. I'll try
>>> and summarize my thoughts
Github user asbaker closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/23
On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:29 , Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Devs,
>>
>> A few of us met in Dublin recently, and we discussed the project roadmap.
>>
>> Key takeaways from that meeting:
>>
>> 1. We'd like to proposed formal time-based releases
>>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, Paul.
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 15:16 , Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> I did some poking through of that docs branch the other day. I'll try
>> and summarize my thoughts but I preface this with the fact I've been
>> up all night
On Jun 17, 2012, at 20:48 , Paul Davis wrote:
> The only thing I see an issue with is the merge commit policy.
>
> You'll find quite quickly that you'll have situations that require
> merge commits with diff's to work properly. A traditional example is
> bug fixes that reach back through many re
Hi Simon,
thanks for the feedback!
On Jun 21, 2012, at 14:27 , Simon Metson wrote:
> I've been prodding Jan's docs branch this morning. Some successes, some
> fails.
>
> * I can't install xsltproc via brew (as in the docs README):
>
> $ brew install xsltproc
> Error: No available formula
Thanks for the feedback, Paul.
On Jun 21, 2012, at 15:16 , Paul Davis wrote:
> I did some poking through of that docs branch the other day. I'll try
> and summarize my thoughts but I preface this with the fact I've been
> up all night debugging.
>
> The biggest technical issues I see is that I r
Github user mrloop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/25
I did some poking through of that docs branch the other day. I'll try
and summarize my thoughts but I preface this with the fact I've been
up all night debugging.
The biggest technical issues I see is that I really dislike having the
non-autotools build inside the autotools build. From the discuss
I've been prodding Jan's docs branch this morning. Some successes, some fails.
* I can't install xsltproc via brew (as in the docs README):
$ brew install xsltproc
Error: No available formula for xsltproc
* Regardless of that I got the docs to build, and made a PDF/bunch of html
files.
*
On 21 June 2012 09:40, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>> I think we're only talking about OTP apps (snappy, ejson/jiffy, mochiweb)
>> here.
>> Would you want those as separate packages?
>
> Yes, preferably. To give an example, if for some reason
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> I think we're only talking about OTP apps (snappy, ejson/jiffy, mochiweb)
> here.
> Would you want those as separate packages?
Yes, preferably. To give an example, if for some reason there was a
security vulnerability in snappy, it would
On 21 June 2012 08:57, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>> Being able to build from source without a network connection is likely a
>> plus for packagers & maintainers.
>
> Not really. As a packager, I would much prefer a clear list of
> (released
24 matches
Mail list logo
