Re: [ANNOUNCE] Michelle Phung joins the PMC

Woohoo, congrats Michelle!! -Russell On Monday, October 19, 2015, Klaus Trainer wrote: > Congrats, Michelle :) > > > On 10/19/2015 11:52 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Dear community, > > > > I am delighted to announce that Michelle Phung joins the Apache CouchDB >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Garren Smith joins the PMC

Congrats Garren!! Glad to have you aboard. -Russell On Monday, October 19, 2015, Klaus Trainer wrote: > Congrats, Garren :) > > > On 10/19/2015 12:31 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Dear community, > > > > I am delighted to announce that Garren Smith joins the Apache

[BLOG] The CouchDB Weekly News, October 21st, is out!

Hi everybody! Here we go with the CouchDB Weekly News: http://blog.couchdb.org/2015/10/21/couchdb-weekly-news-october-21-2015/ Discussions: 2.0 progress with EUnit tests News and Opinions Blog Posts on “Enabling Full

Re: Fauxton Windows developer question

Hi Robert, I can certainly also give fb sat+ Sebastian Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 20.10.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Robert Kowalski : > > Hey there, > > I am currently working with our old & grown Gruntfile.js [1] together with > the files in tasks/ > > The gruntfile

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

This will never end... First, this thread goes to be offtopic with unrelated flame discussion about anything, but not new shiny JS rewrites. If you want to continue, please start new thread - this will help to sort all the things. Second, let's stop call things broken, dead end, doomed, without

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 13:08, Harald Kisch wrote: > >> This project doesn’t have the capacity to get a distributed syncing > database AND an application server platform going > at the same time. > > So please explain: Why CouchAppers get bothered every time when CouchApps

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 13:43, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > This will never end... > > First, this thread goes to be offtopic with unrelated flame discussion > about anything, but not new shiny JS rewrites. If you want to > continue, please start new thread - this will help to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

> This project doesn’t have the capacity to get a distributed syncing database AND an application server platform going > at the same time. So please explain: Why CouchAppers get bothered every time when CouchApps comes to discussion? I thought the CouchApp discussions are very welcome @dev.