Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename 3.x branch to main and include docs in the main repo

2022-06-04 Thread Nick Vatamaniuc
Looking at https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versions.html, they recognize an explicit "stable" tag or just picks the latest semantic version branch or tag. They use https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/ rules to parse and that allows for a ".postN" suffix for a tag/branch. So we could have a 3.2.2

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename 3.x branch to main and include docs in the main repo

2022-06-04 Thread Ronny Berndt
+1, for the branch renaming part For the docs integration part, I’m at ± 0: Is it possible to distinguish what has been changed in a repository? For example: Are there changes in - /docs -> rebuild and publish docs - /src -> couchdb ci run Or is it an all or nothing approach of PR’s in GitHub

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename 3.x branch to main and include docs in the main repo

2022-06-04 Thread Will Young
I'm fully in favor of part 1, +1 On the docs, I'd say a slightly hesitant +1 as is, given the situation Jan describes. I still think it would be an improvement to merge the repo since PRs which correctly update couchdb+docs would more likely keep changes and their docs together. Aside from direct

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename 3.x branch to main and include docs in the main repo

2022-06-04 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Heya Nick, thanks for taking my raw idea to the larger group here :) The one other point that started the whole thing is our publishing of docs. We have a stable and a latest tag where latest just tracks the main branch on the docs repo and stable we move manually when a new release comes out.