I have just worked out a patch on branch 0.11.x.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Do you have a patch to add that behaviour? :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
--
Li Zhengji
Not yet.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>
> Do you have a patch to add that behaviour? :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
--
Li Zhengji
Hi all,
Since "raw collation" is introduced in 0.11, I suggest to make the
start of couch_icu_driver lazy. Then it's possible for applications
that does not care about Unicode collation to get rid of the large ICU
library completely.
Hope to see this in the 1st patch version of 0.11.
4, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Li Zhengji wrote:
> For DB compaction, I think that besides to ask Erlang/OTP team to
> modify BEAM VM, a patch to the VM is also easy and possible.
>
> For example, I have sent a patch to user list:
>
>> Here is a quick fix for R13B(5.7.1) beam.smp.dll
>
t implementation, design docs are self-contained. This is the
advantage. Am I correct?
--
Li Zhengji
ot;emit".
>
> On the face of it, I'm not sure the "fold" approach is a good match for the
> btree-based index storage that CouchDB uses. But maybe I'm just not thinking
> about it hard enough.
>
> Thanks for posting these thoughts -- always nice to get a fresh look at
> things. Best,
>
> Adam
>
--
Li Zhengji
uot;
flag (like fold), then the reduce function would be simpler:
fun (keys, values, Acc) -> updated Acc.
We just need to attach an "Acc" field for reduce in view doc.
--
Li Zhengji
script. (Thanks Mark!)
>
--
Li Zhengji
