Github user indutny closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/3
Github user indutny closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/76
GitHub user indutny opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/76
share/server: use toString instead of toSource
Object.toSource is [non-standard][0] and missing in v8 and probably
other javascript VMs. Its better to chop it off now that feel pain later
Github user indutny closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/67
GitHub user indutny reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/67
couch_users_db: introduce public_users option
When `couchdb.public_users` is set to `true`, getting `/_users/id` will
return user document with sensitive information stripped.
You can merge
GitHub user indutny opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/67
couch_users_db: introduce public_users option
When `couchdb.public_users` is set to `true`, getting `/_users/id` will
return user document with sensitive information stripped.
You can merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554872#comment-13554872
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-1643:
I can't guarantee stability of VM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554935#comment-13554935
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-1643:
If you're searching for versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554963#comment-13554963
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-1643:
Benoit, can you please tell me on which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13555161#comment-13555161
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-1643:
Ah, you're talking about shared library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13552004#comment-13552004
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-1643:
Adam, please describe this issue
Fedor Indutny created COUCHDB-1623:
--
Summary: Replication of user database and conflicts
Key: COUCHDB-1623
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1623
Project: CouchDB
Issue
Done ;)
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:29 , Fedor Indutny wrote:
Speaking of that, can I ask to add me to THANKS file? ;)
Done, can you in turn close your PR on GitHub? :)
Cheers
Jan
--
Cheers
Speaking of that, can I ask to add me to THANKS file? ;)
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 17, 2012, at 22:05 , Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 17, 2012, at 21:56 ,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13102810#comment-13102810
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-986:
---
https://github.com/indutny/couchdb/compare
+1 for that, I don't like current directory structure.
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on this topic. I know that @davisp made a script to split the
file structure etc, but I wonder why or what we are waiting to do
Whoa!
I owe you a bottle of vodka :)
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13041694#comment-13041694
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-986:
---
Glad to see raising interest for my past
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13020796#comment-13020796
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-979:
---
Yep, with all.
That can be useful if one
Components: Database Core
Affects Versions: 1.0
Environment: Ubuntu 10.10
Doesn't matter
Reporter: Fedor Indutny
Try to save following doc to couchdb:
{ _id : json-test, test: \u0080-\u}
And then put it to the database:
curl -X PUT -d @1.json --basic --user admin:admin -H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990177#comment-12990177
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-1057:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt
+1
2011/1/20 till t...@php.net
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
Changes since the last round:
* Fix raw view document link due to overlealous URI encoding in
Futon.
* Spell
: 1.0.1
Reporter: Fedor Indutny
I'll implement EventSource protocol feed for _changes API (feed=eventsource).
Some info about it: http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
It's more useful than websocket, beacause it's read-only.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971288#action_12971288
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-986:
---
Proposed patch for trunk (Needs testing
Affects Versions: 1.0.1
Environment: Doesn't matter
Reporter: Fedor Indutny
Suppose you're listening for the db changes:
var promise = app.db.changes(0);
And want to stop listening:
promise.stop();
But it will only prevent reconnecting and event triggering, while
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fedor Indutny updated COUCHDB-978:
--
Attachment: 0001-jquery.couch.js-db.changes-.stop-should-abort-XMLHTT.patch
Proposed fix
: 1.0.1
Reporter: Fedor Indutny
Add functionality to transform _changes with list functions, for example:
http://somehost:5984/_design/name/_list/list-name/_changes?feed=longpoll
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969296#action_12969296
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-979:
---
I think, I can do it.
Use list function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969311#action_12969311
]
Fedor Indutny commented on COUCHDB-979:
---
Sorry, I was wrong - that's impossible
this.
Link to pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/3
--
Cheers,
Fedor Indutny.
Skype: fedor.indutny
Gtalk: fedor.indu...@gmail.com
Github: http://github.com/donnerjack13589
for the system to have a special
entity named ALL where access to everyone is not implied by the
absence of record in _authorization for the _type but could be made
explicitly if desired.
--
Cheers,
Fedor Indutny.
Skype: fedor.indutny
Gtalk: fedor.indu...@gmail.com
Github: http://github.com
and view reductions in the first place. I recently saw a suggestion on the
mailing list to have an access control function for views on the design
document, that seems like a nice fix for securing access to views
themselves.
- Chad
--
Cheers,
Fedor Indutny.
Skype: fedor.indutny
Gtalk
and docs separately.
2010/11/9 Fedor Indutny fedor.indu...@gmail.com
Yes, sorry it was not clear, but it's exactly like you're saying.
So my proposal is:
Add *validate_doc_view* function in _design documents with arguments like
*doc, userCtx, req*.
Add *validate_view_access* function
I think we must discuss here, whether we can bypass this access limitation
or not.
If we can - this access limitation is useless, if not - we definitely must
review it and think about adding this to couchdb.
2010/11/9 Fedor Indutny fedor.indu...@gmail.com
So I'm extending my proposal
, for example, views could show only *title* field of document, while *
price* field will be hidden in a document itself.
What do you think?
--
(Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP developer)
Fedor Indutny
, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Fedor Indutny fedor.indu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone!
You've discussed earlier possibility of adding access validators to
_design
documents, this feature it's a kind of thing that many couchdb users will
be
glad to see.
The conclusion of previous
http://damienkatz.net/2010/08/whats_new_in_couchdb_10_securi.html
they are implemented in recent versions of Opera, Safari and Firefox:
--
Fedor Indutny
a contribution,
Bram
--
Fedor Indutny
38 matches
Mail list logo
