I gave it a try in https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/3837
There are two separate commits - tooling and actual formatting. The
Erlang version check didn't seem too bad to implement. Hopefully soon
we'll jump to 21+ and can clean that code up.
>From the main branch I ported all the formatting
Hi Jay,
I don't really agree with many of the choices erlfmt makes either. I
personally like emilio's [1] syntax rules better. But, I think there
is still a net benefit to having a standardized format that is
automatically applied and enforced. The automated part helps when
reviewing PRs / contrib
Hi Nick,
As with main, my objections to a mass reformatting of hundreds of files
boils down to:
1. Making it more difficult to understand the logical changes of the code
(via blame) after reformatting
2. I don't agree with all the opinions of the formatter, nor does my
editor/mode
Is this someth
Hi all,
I had noticed we had agreed to use erlfmt but only ran it on main and
not 3.x. That makes it harder to port changes or diff-ing modules
sometimes. Would there be any objections to a pull request
reformatting 3.x?
The only issue is that we may have to avoid running erlfmt if we
detect Erla
