[VOTE RESULTS] (Was Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round)

Hello, The final tally of the vote is: 13 +1 votes This exceeds the required minimum three +1 votes and the proposal passes. I shall prepare the release as soon as possible. The individual votes are as follows: +1 Robert Newson http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couch

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

I can't get couch to run. It builds fine, "make check" passes, and I should have all dependencies. Here are the steps taken: $ ./configure $ make $ make dev $ ./utils/run results in this error Is there some other way I should be running couch? -Gilbert On Fri, Mar 26,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

+1 Tested on Ubuntu 9.10 and Mac OS X 10.6.2, both with Firefox 3.6.2 and OTP R13B03 and R13B04. All tests are passing and most of the time in the first run. -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

R13B-04 OS X 10.6.2 Webkit r56098 make check ok js tests ok I must have run the js tests at least ten times on FF 3.6.2 but couldn't get them all to pass when simply hitting "Run All". I guess it's a problem with my browser, but it certainly is frustrating. I hope we can move the bulk of the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 21:22, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > Gentoo Linux, on amd64 > Erlang R13B02 > make check: OK > Test suite on Firefox 3.6.2 (OS X 10.6): all good, except for > "Exception raised: {}" in reader_acl Same server, but now using Firefox 3.6.2 on Windows XP: reader_acl still fails the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Oh, BTW, I meant to +1 back then... Passes the tests for my app (^_-) On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > Can an > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:33, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> so i don't get the stuff I had yesterday with previous artefact. >> However changes tests only work when I launch it alone. I supposed >> it's due to slowness of macbook IO

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Can an On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:33, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > so i don't get the stuff I had yesterday with previous artefact. > However changes tests only work when I launch it alone. I supposed > it's due to slowness of macbook IO. Others tests are ok. make check is > ok Can you or anyone els

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> >>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote: >>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote: > Anyway,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. > > Changes since the last round: > > * Build system now supports OS X for release preparation. > +1 on this release. All tests pass for me on

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Brian Candler wrote: >> Brian, Benoit, can you both double check and do a clean-slate installation >> into a new --prefix if you haven't done so? > > Unfortunately the original box I was using is now powered down until next > week. > > I have done a test on anothe

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

> Brian, Benoit, can you both double check and do a clean-slate installation > into a new --prefix if you haven't done so? Unfortunately the original box I was using is now powered down until next week. I have done a test on another box (Ubuntu Karmic, x86_64). The test suite under Firefox gave

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Mac OS X 10.5.8 Erlang R13B02 Firefox 3.6.2 Safari 4.0.4 make check: OK Passed unit tests for my internal Couch 0.10 application. Firefox browser test failure: content_negotiation Assertion failed: expected 'text/plain;charset=utf-8', got 'application/json' Safari browser test error: list_views

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:47, Christopher Brown wrote: > Sorry for the hassle. Just wanted to make sure I understood and that > I'm also following the same process. Again, the ASF is all about transparency, if there's anything unclear to anyone here, you shouldn't hesitate to ask for clarification

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Sorry for the hassle. Just wanted to make sure I understood and that I'm also following the same process. Thanks again! Chris Jan Lehnardt wrote: > On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:28, Christopher Brown wrote: > >> Can I ask a process point here? > > Of course, any time. > >> I'm seeing people saying "I

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:28, Christopher Brown wrote: > Can I ask a process point here? Of course, any time. > I'm seeing people saying "I may have missed a commit" and being asked to > do a clean install to run these tests, which makes me wonder if we are > all testing the same thing. When Noah

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: > Can I ask a process point here? > > I'm seeing people saying "I may have missed a commit" and being asked to > do a clean install to run these tests, which makes me wonder if we are > all testing the same thing.  When Noah sends out mail

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> >>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote: >>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote: > Anyway,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> >>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote: >>> Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibl

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Can I ask a process point here? I'm seeing people saying "I may have missed a commit" and being asked to do a clean install to run these tests, which makes me wonder if we are all testing the same thing. When Noah sends out mail saying "these are the artifacts to vote on", is everyone ensuring th

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote: > >> >> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote: >> >>> Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibly >>> something to do with my setup, and browser-based tests are

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On 24 Mar 2010, at 02:44, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote: > >> Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibly >> something to do with my setup, and browser-based tests are fragile anyway. >> Hence I'm not going to vote against the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Mac OS X 10.6.2 (10C540) make check: ok browser test suite: ok (using Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6) +1 On 23.03.2010, at 19:49, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, secon

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:04:32PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > I reported the same yesterday. Had to remove the db folder and > relaunch the tests. Something happend in last 2 weeks about these > tests. Certainly my system has been through some odd versions of trunk, but doesn't the test suite

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Fwiw: Ubuntu Karmic Erlang R13B03 Ok + 1 -- David Coallier

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Brian Candler wrote: >> Now installs fine under Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) i386, once I'd remembered to >> rm -rf /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib. >> >> However, the in-browser test suite gave me various interm

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Brian Candler wrote: > Now installs fine under Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) i386, once I'd remembered to > rm -rf /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib. > > However, the in-browser test suite gave me various intermittent errors. > > Quite consistently I could get this one, eve

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:40, Brian Candler wrote: > Anyway, nobody else seems to have had this problem, it's quite possibly > something to do with my setup, and browser-based tests are fragile anyway. > Hence I'm not going to vote against the release. It's a 0 from me. Not true, you are the secon

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Now installs fine under Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) i386, once I'd remembered to rm -rf /usr/local/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib. However, the in-browser test suite gave me various intermittent errors. Quite consistently I could get this one, even after disabling firefox extensions(*): reader_acl error

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

+1 OSX 10.6.2 Erlang R13B03 make check all pass FF all pass Safari -- couple of glitches On Mar 23, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. > > Changes since the last round: > > * Build system n

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

+1 for me Tested on Ubuntu karmic and Debian sid. -- Sam Bisbee

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Mac OS X 10.6.2 + Ubuntu Linux Ubuntu 8.10 all fine. +1 Cheers Jan -- On 23 Mar 2010, at 11:49, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. > > Changes since the last round: > > * Build system now supports OS X for rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 19:49, Noah Slater wrote: > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. Gentoo Linux, on amd64 Erlang R13B02 make check: OK Test suite on Firefox 3.6.2 (OS X 10.6): all good, except for "Exception raised: {}" in reader_acl Cheers, Dirkja

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

+1 Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D572) Erlang R13B04 make check: OK Test suite on Safari 4.0.5: OK 23 mar 2010 kl. 19.49 skrev Noah Slater: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. > > Changes since the last round: > > * Build system now support

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

+1 OS: Mac OS X 10.6.2 Erlang: R13B04 Spidermonkey: 1.9.2 make check: ok browser tests pass (Firefox 3.6) B. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. > > Changes since the last round: > >    

[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round

Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, second round. Changes since the last round: * Build system now supports OS X for release preparation. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be