+1
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:36 PM Andy Wenk wrote:
> +1
>
> > On 6. Mar 2019, at 10:41, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> On 5. Mar 2019, at 21:18, Joan Touzet wrote:
> >>
> >> (Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
> >> also including the diff of the
+1
> On 6. Mar 2019, at 10:41, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On 5. Mar 2019, at 21:18, Joan Touzet wrote:
>>
>> (Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
>> also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
>> request.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
+1
> On 5. Mar 2019, at 21:18, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> (Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
> also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
> request.)
>
>
>
> PMC Members,
>
> This is a VOTE to create or amend our official
+1 thanks Joan for working on this
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:10 AM Joan Touzet wrote:
> +1 to my own proposal.
>
> -Joan
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Joan Touzet"
> > To: "CouchDB Developers"
> > Sent: Tuesday, 5 March, 2019 3:18:01 PM
> > Subject: [VOTE] Bylaws change:
+1 to my own proposal.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Joan Touzet"
> To: "CouchDB Developers"
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 March, 2019 3:18:01 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Bylaws change: Establish a Request For Comments (RFC) process
> for major new contribution (revised)
>
> (Revised: The
+1
--
Robert Samuel Newson
rnew...@apache.org
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, at 20:18, Joan Touzet wrote:
> (Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
> also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
> request.)
>
>
>
> PMC Members,
>
> This
(Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
request.)
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Request For Comments (RFC) process through
