For the record, I think it's important to remember that design docs
are extensible, i.e. couchapp-style tools should also support
'fulltext' (couchdb-lucene), 'spatial' (geocouch), etc members. In
general, that means blindly building a design doc from whatever bits
(js, json, plain text) are on dis
On 11/30/13, 7:20 PM, Russell Branca wrote:
A couple of options for approach would be to formalize the folder
definition of a couchapp and list tools known to be compatible
First parts done:
https://github.com/couchapp/couchapp/wiki/Complete-Filesystem-to-Design-Doc-Mapping-Example
erica and c
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Peter Nolan wrote:
> the purpose of 'what a couchapp is' in my previous email was intended to
> clarify what a couchapp is. In the past, there has been many discussions
> on what exactly constitutes a 'couchapp', and i just wanted to express my
> view what a 'couc
Heya,
the purpose of 'what a couchapp is' in my previous email was intended to
clarify what a couchapp is. In the past, there has been many discussions
on what exactly constitutes a 'couchapp', and i just wanted to express my
view what a 'couchapp' is. And more importantly, to emphasize the
inde
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Peter Nolan wrote:
> Personally, what i'd like to see from 'couch-apps'. is the ability for a
> layman to be able to develop websites that use couchdb as the database,
> knowing only
>
> HTML
> CSS
> Javascript
> Couchdb
>
>
> Without needing the following
> 1) ch
Hey all,
First off I'd like to say that it's absolutely wonderful that there is such
passion for couchapps these many years later. The problems that couchapp
has will only be solved if people care to solve em, which we do, so yay!
I think one of the big problems that couch-app has had is haphaza
Hi folks,
We expect the mailing list to be a friendly and welcoming environment
for everyone. This is very important for the community, so please try
to keep it that way. I will follow up with people in private if any
further clarification is needed.
Thank you,
On 3 December 2013 23:46, david ma
NO!
--
David Martin
I have no idea what that email was about, could you clarify please?
david martin wrote:
>On 02/12/13 14:16, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Thanks Benoit.
>>
>> If J Chris does not want to cede control of the domain, we might want
>> to consider using ourGoogle juice to get another website to the top
>>
On 02/12/13 14:16, Noah Slater wrote:
Thanks Benoit.
If J Chris does not want to cede control of the domain, we might want
to consider using ourGoogle juice to get another website to the top
of the search results.
To everyone else in the thread: I know you guys are passionate about
this stuff,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Vivek Pathak wrote:
>
> Firstly, let me thank you all on the great work you have done with couch.
> Thanks.
>
> Secondly, regardless of JChris/domain ownership/personal likings etc; Is
> there any possibility of improving (or changing) couchapp (or its
> replacem
Firstly, let me thank you all on the great work you have done with
couch. Thanks.
Secondly, regardless of JChris/domain ownership/personal likings etc;
Is there any possibility of improving (or changing) couchapp (or its
replacement's) functionality?
For example:
1. Javascript stored o
So funnily enough I just got an email that couchapp.net which I had
registered was in its redemption period, I just renewed it and anyone is
free to it
On 2 December 2013 14:16, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks Benoit.
>
> If J Chris does not want to cede control of the domain, we might want
> to co
Thanks Benoit.
If J Chris does not want to cede control of the domain, we might want
to consider using our Google juice to get another website to the top
of the search results.
To everyone else in the thread: I know you guys are passionate about
this stuff, but please try to relax a little. I did
just a quick update about this topic. jchris has been contacted and I
exchanged a mail with him yesterday. Maybe some good news around will see.
I will keep this thread updated asap.
Also thanks for your help all. I propose to coordinate sometimes this week
once we know more :)
- benoit
On Mon,
On 2 December 2013 12:51, Octavian Damiean wrote:
> > It's hard to say for the whole community, but better to say who
> > (personally) wants to maintain and collaborate in couchapp.org
> > support. I'd like to, pretty sure that Benoit too. Who else?
>
me!
Cheers
Andy
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - G
I'd volunteer as well Alex.
On Dec 2, 2013 12:01 PM, "Alexander Shorin" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> > - do we (the CouchDB community) want to maintain the contents? Regardless
> > if it is "part" of CouchDB or not (this is a never-ending discussion
> imho)
>
> It
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> - do we (the CouchDB community) want to maintain the contents? Regardless
> if it is "part" of CouchDB or not (this is a never-ending discussion imho)
It's hard to say for the whole community, but better to say who
(personally) wants to maintain
why don't we stop the discussion here and think about how couchapp.org or
at least the contents can be maintained further? There are only some points
to clarify:
- do we (the CouchDB community) want to maintain the contents? Regardless
if it is "part" of CouchDB or not (this is a never-ending disc
Hi
I agree quite a bit about the coucapp. Hence couldnt help but comment.
Couchapp does seem to have quite a few rough corners feel to it - when
compared to the soundness of couchdb as a whole (even without bigcouch
etc).
I have been using a self written tool to push view/list/show code to
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Filippo Fadda <
filippo.fa...@programmazione.it> wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> > You can do the same with Erlang query server since it has access to
> > all internal functions.
>
> I can do it in PHP inside my Query Server (I alrea
Filippo,
I heard you, thanks.
And FYI show, list and other functions are already "plugins": you may
disable them at httpd_design_handlers config section in any time or
replace them by your own implementation.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Filippo Fadda
wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2013
I'm not a neophyte, I have just a different opinion of yours. Republicans and
democrats don't share same opinions, and even inside a group you can find
people with different opinions and you have to respect them, always. This is
called democracy.
I don't decide the goals myself, but I can expres
On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> You can do the same with Erlang query server since it has access to
> all internal functions.
I can do it in PHP inside my Query Server (I already said this to you), without
the need to investigate the CouchDB internals, trying to find the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.12.2013 01:20, Russell Branca wrote:
> In its current form, couchapp.org is a relic that has been mostly
> abandoned and is not maintainable by the community. I strongly feel
> we should move the couchapp documentation into official
> documentati
On 01/12/13 00:20, Russell Branca wrote:
In its current form, couchapp.org is a relic that has been mostly abandoned
and is not maintainable by the community. I strongly feel we should move
the couchapp documentation into official documentation. I see two relevant
points of interest in this discu
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Russell Branca wrote:
> In its current form, couchapp.org is a relic that has been mostly abandoned
> and is not maintainable by the community. I strongly feel we should move
> the couchapp documentation into official documentation. I see two relevant
> points of in
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Filippo Fadda
wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> And you keep ignoring what I said about the doc. Ie. it is not complete
>> (and it must be fixed).
>>
>> Like stored procedure they are stored. Like stored procedure they can be
>> used
On Dec 1, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> And you keep ignoring what I said about the doc. Ie. it is not complete
> (and it must be fixed).
>
> Like stored procedure they are stored. Like stored procedure they can be
> used in a query. Afaik queries happen on HTTP level in couchdb.
>
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Russell Branca wrote:
> In its current form, couchapp.org is a relic that has been mostly
> abandoned
> and is not maintainable by the community. I strongly feel we should move
> the couchapp documentation into official documentation. I see two relevant
> points of
In its current form, couchapp.org is a relic that has been mostly abandoned
and is not maintainable by the community. I strongly feel we should move
the couchapp documentation into official documentation. I see two relevant
points of interest in this discussion. First is the notion of couchapps as
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Filippo Fadda <
filippo.fa...@programmazione.it> wrote:
> List and show are not stored procedure. We already discussed that Benoit.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Formatting_with_Show_and_List
>
> From the documentation: "Show and list functions are side effec
List and show are not stored procedure. We already discussed that Benoit.
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Formatting_with_Show_and_List
From the documentation: "Show and list functions are side effect free and
idempotent. They can not make additional HTTP requests against CouchDB. Their
purpose
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Filippo Fadda <
filippo.fa...@programmazione.it> wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> PgREST is not PostgreSQL anyway, it's a project that uses PostgreSQL and I
> think CouchApp should be the same, maybe a plugin but not a core feature.
>
But PgRest is only possible if you can
Alexander,
PgREST is not PostgreSQL anyway, it's a project that uses PostgreSQL and I
think CouchApp should be the same, maybe a plugin but not a core feature.
Which are the CouchDB goals? The goals are determined at blastoff time. You
must ensure the goals are reasonable, attainable, simply st
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Filippo Fadda
wrote:
> CouchDB is a database. And IMHO couch apps are something that shouldn't be
> part of the CouchDB core. Benoit asked a very simple question and I gave my
> opinion. I think who matters should take a position on the subject because I
> can u
David,
for me, and I speak just for myself, CouchDB is a database. And IMHO couch apps
are something that shouldn't be part of the CouchDB core. Benoit asked a very
simple question and I gave my opinion. I think who matters should take a
position on the subject because I can understand Benoit f
On 30/11/13 15:41, Filippo Fadda wrote:
maybe hurt your feelings?
Many people cut their teeth on couchapp (not couchapps), implemented by Benoit.
Many people learned the rudiments of CouchDB and probed the limitations of many
things using the Python based couchapp interface .
Your views are
FWIW the domain expires on Dec 13th in a couple weeks. If couchbase doesn't
care about it, maybe they won't renew it?
Jim Klo
Senior Software Engineer
SRI International
t: @nsomnac
On Nov 30, 2013, at 8:18 AM, "Octavian Damiean"
mailto:odami...@linux.com>> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 4:41 P
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Filippo Fadda <
filippo.fa...@programmazione.it> wrote:
> Anyway, if you decide (I mean you all) that the couch apps are an integral
> CouchDB part, I think they should be a topic of the CouchDB main site and
> not live in a separate domain. Else, if you consider c
I can understand your frustration but I see other members are avoiding your
question because they don't want take a position (or maybe hurt your
feelings?). Dirkjan is the only one has taken a position and, personally, I
agree with him, but you already know that since we discussed, partially, th
+1
couchapp is quite known brand of not the one, but group of CouchDB
features. Even if couchapp.org isn't be a part of project, if it
doesn't works well - it makes CouchDB not bad, but also not good
reputation. People has a bit different measurement that based on
feelings (is it informative, works
+1 even if we decide that the concept shouldn't be part of the core project
we should make sure that it is maintained well since it represents a
community effort and w certainly don't want our community to look broken.
On Nov 30, 2013 12:46 PM, "Jan Lehnardt" wrote:
>
> On 30 Nov 2013, at 11:34 ,
On 30 Nov 2013, at 11:34 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> If we considers the couchapps concept as a part of the couchdb project,
>> then we should:
>>
>> - either start some action
>>
>> - or find a new name and new way to document the c
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> If we considers the couchapps concept as a part of the couchdb project,
> then we should:
>
> - either start some action
>
> - or find a new name and new way to document the concept
>
> If some of you consider that we should just ditch th
Enough is enough,
I am starting to be really frustrated this situation. Not having any
control on the couchapp.org starts to be really annoying. It is now 1 week
since the couchapp.org website is spammed without any possibility to revert
the content or whatever.
I will yet again contact Jchris an
46 matches
Mail list logo
