Ok, I've now tested this against Centos x64 and confirmed everything
builds correctly. You'll have to modify the .spec to use the
js-devel-1.7 if required.
Wendall
On 03/10/2012 06:07 PM, Wendall Cada wrote:
I'm updated one of the patches and fixed the spec to use the proper
libdir path. I be
I'm updated one of the patches and fixed the spec to use the proper
libdir path. I belive this will work correctly on Centos x64. I haven't
tested yet, testing some other patches first, then will build on an x64
box to test.
Wendall
On 03/10/2012 04:37 PM, Wendall Cada wrote:
Sorry, that was
Sorry, that was a hackish patch, so I removed it. I'll figure out a
proper way to make this work. Thanks for the feedback. There will be
another problem later in the build process with this same issue that
needs resolved as well.
Thanks,
Wendall
On 03/10/2012 01:50 PM, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the tip Randall.
The original (EPEL6) couchdb 1.0.2 srpm has an "autoreconf" patch
included that contains a line with
sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib64 /usr/lib64 /lib /usr/lib"
I don't know if anything else of that 'autoreconf' patch is also
needed for it to work correctly, bu
Try --libdir=/usr/lib64
IIRC, this is due to x86_64 CentOS treating /usr/lib as the lib
directory rather than /usr/lib64.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 00:41, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running on a CentOS 6.2 x86_64 machine and I get a build error
> related to erl_driver.h.
> (note I have be
Hi,
I'm running on a CentOS 6.2 x86_64 machine and I get a build error
related to erl_driver.h.
(note I have been able to rebuild the couchdb-1.0.2 RPMS without any
issues in this same environment)
checking erl_driver.h usability... no
checking erl_driver.h presence... no
checking for erl_driver.
Cool. Please let us know how you get on. Getting packages in either would
be a huge bonus for the project. Maybe the maintainer would be open to
co-maintainership?
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Wendall Cada wrote:
> I'll ping the maintainer with the revisions I've made. There has been very
> l
I'll ping the maintainer with the revisions I've made. There has been
very little progress for quite some time from this maintainer, so I'm
withholding expectations. For now, just giving people the ability to
install from a compatible package is a start. I don't have any
established relationshi
This is great! And way to get them in Fedora or CentOS?
On 8 Mar 2012, at 17:24, Wendall Cada wrote:
> I've created a working spec file and patches that match what's available in
> Fedora (couchdb-1.0.3) and Centos (couchdb-1.0.2), but for 1.2.0-git. I've
> added a patch for COUCHDB-1424 pro
I've created a working spec file and patches that match what's available
in Fedora (couchdb-1.0.3) and Centos (couchdb-1.0.2), but for 1.2.0-git.
I've added a patch for COUCHDB-1424 provided by Filipe. I'll pull this
patch out once 1.2.0 is ready for a vote again and other changes have
been pus
10 matches
Mail list logo
