the couchdb-fauxton repository has been created. Please keep it in sync :)
- benoit
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Sue deathbearbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm fine with tagging my commits.
thanks. By tagging I meant
When are we actually moving over to the seperate repos and what are the git
commands to keep it in sync?
On 17 Feb 2014, at 10:11 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
the couchdb-fauxton repository has been created. Please keep it in sync :)
- benoit
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
When are we actually moving over to the seperate repos and what are the git
commands to keep it in sync?
both merge repository are using splitted repository to my knowledge
(see my latest status abour rcouch).
I don't
Fauxton is actually fairly simple to split out with subtree. I
wouldn't worry about maintaining things in sync just yet.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Garren Smith gar...@apache.org wrote:
When are we actually moving
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Simon Metson si...@cloudant.com wrote:
Seems awfully complicated to make fauxton erlang shaped when we
already have the simple static file handler.
depends if fauxton eed more in the future. but for now I agree. Not sure
though how the final build could be
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Sue deathbearbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm fine with tagging my commits.
thanks. By tagging I meant adding smth like fauxton: in the commit line ;)
- benoit
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Simon Metson si...@cloudant.com wrote:
Seems awfully complicated to
There are a lot of fauxton commits landing in master. Which is fine I guess
but that makes it hard to check other commits. Can you eventually tag them
with fauxton: or whatever saying fauxton. It will be a lot easier to
filter when looking for other patches.
Thanks!
- benoit
While we're going to multirepos does this really need?
I think it's good reminder to migrate project structure ASAP to reduce
overall annoying level (;
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a lot of fauxton commits landing in master.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
While we're going to multirepos does this really need?
I think it's good reminder to migrate project structure ASAP to reduce
overall annoying level (;
agree, but until we go to that ...
- benoit
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.comwrote:
There are a lot of fauxton commits landing in master. Which is fine I
guess but that makes it hard to check other commits. Can you eventually tag
them with fauxton: or whatever saying fauxton. It will be a lot easier
What's needed to complete that (if only for fauxton)? Is it just a case of
importing code to the new repo and changing origins, or is there more (e.g.
Build scripts)?
On Wednesday, 29 January 2014 at 10:03, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Alexander Shorin
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Simon Metson si...@cloudant.com wrote:
What's needed to complete that (if only for fauxton)? Is it just a case of
importing code to the new repo and changing origins, or is there more (e.g.
Build scripts)?
I was thinking to this. Maybe this can be done in a
Seems awfully complicated to make fauxton erlang shaped when we
already have the simple static file handler.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Simon Metson si...@cloudant.com wrote:
What's needed to complete that (if
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.comwrote:
Seems awfully complicated to make fauxton erlang shaped when we
already have the simple static file handler.
depends if fauxton eed more in the future. but for now I agree. Not sure
though how the final build could
Seems awfully complicated to make fauxton erlang shaped when we
already have the simple static file handler.
depends if fauxton eed more in the future. but for now I agree. Not sure
though how the final build could be done for the release? sub-modules? or
just a curl fetch and that's
I'm fine with tagging my commits.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Simon Metson si...@cloudant.com wrote:
Seems awfully complicated to make fauxton erlang shaped when we
already have the simple static file handler.
depends if fauxton eed more in the future. but for now I agree. Not
16 matches
Mail list logo
