> Apparently all repos are OK except the couch_mrview one . The tests
> 09- and 10- has disappeared from it. I am trying to see if i can
> create a new branch with them without losing the history.
>
Hard to say. I'll go back and try and compare logs to see where I went wrong.
> I didn't launched
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> I've managed to split out the following rcouch applications:
>
> couch_index
> couch_mrview
> couch_replicator
> couch_collate
> couch_httpd
> couch
>
> And I've pushed them to their respective repositories on branches
> named import-rcouch.
>
>
Nope, didn't have to do anything special for couch which was nice.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
>> I've managed to split out the following rcouch applications:
>>
>> couch_index
>> couch_mrview
>> couch_replicator
>
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> I've managed to split out the following rcouch applications:
>
> couch_index
> couch_mrview
> couch_replicator
> couch_collate
> couch_httpd
> couch
>
> And I've pushed them to their respective repositories on branches
> named import-rcouch.
>
>
I've managed to split out the following rcouch applications:
couch_index
couch_mrview
couch_replicator
couch_collate
couch_httpd
couch
And I've pushed them to their respective repositories on branches
named import-rcouch.
This is the procedure I used to do the extract:
https://gist.github.com/d
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> So this turned into more of a thing than I thought it'd be though I
> have at least gotten couch_index split out onto a branch I think. I
> need to do some diff's to make sure that its identical and then have
> Benoit read the history to make su
So this turned into more of a thing than I thought it'd be though I
have at least gotten couch_index split out onto a branch I think. I
need to do some diff's to make sure that its identical and then have
Benoit read the history to make sure its all sane. My notes on the
requisite git gymnastics ar
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> Cool. I'm gonna take a crack at getting all of the rcouch versions of
> apps split out into their respective repositories to see how hard
> it'll be to get things merged between the rcouch and bigcouch
> versions.
>
> I'll push anything I make to
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Paul Davis >wrote:
> >
> >> Why the rename if you don't want to rename modules and all that comes
> >> with it? If you just rename the directory, couch
Cool. I'm gonna take a crack at getting all of the rcouch versions of
apps split out into their respective repositories to see how hard
it'll be to get things merged between the rcouch and bigcouch
versions.
I'll push anything I make to branches named import-rcouch and will
paste the commands I us
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> Why the rename if you don't want to rename modules and all that comes
>> with it? If you just rename the directory, couch.app.src, and
>> couch.erl I'm not sure I see the benefit.
>>
>
>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I am seeing that bigcouch is splitting everything in its own repo. I could
> also do the same for rcouch quite easily. The question is how.
>
> I basically need the following repo:
>
> couch_collate
> couch_mrview
> couch_index
> couch_repl
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> Why the rename if you don't want to rename modules and all that comes
> with it? If you just rename the directory, couch.app.src, and
> couch.erl I'm not sure I see the benefit.
>
saying it's the core.
Why the rename if you don't want to rename modules and all that comes
with it? If you just rename the directory, couch.app.src, and
couch.erl I'm not sure I see the benefit.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> > ok, make
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> > ok, make sense since i have also at some point moved it to src/couch (and
> > will be renamed to couch_core soon in rcouch).
>
> Why are you wanting to rename couch to couch_core? Erlang standard is
> to have "app/src/app_*.erl". Renaming every
> ok, make sense since i have also at some point moved it to src/couch (and
> will be renamed to couch_core soon in rcouch).
Why are you wanting to rename couch to couch_core? Erlang standard is
to have "app/src/app_*.erl". Renaming everything to couch_core_*.erl
would be a fairly massive change.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> All of those repos already exist:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?s=couchdb
perfect
>
>
> Some but not all of those I've done the initial legwork on extracting
> source code from couch and/or rcouch. I have some time right now whil
All of those repos already exist:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?s=couchdb
Some but not all of those I've done the initial legwork on extracting
source code from couch and/or rcouch. I have some time right now while
I wait on other things to pull those at into new branches named
somethin
I am seeing that bigcouch is splitting everything in its own repo. I could
also do the same for rcouch quite easily. The question is how.
I basically need the following repo:
couch_collate
couch_mrview
couch_index
couch_replicator
couch_httpd
couch_collate
(and probably soon a couch_js)
I think
19 matches
Mail list logo
