Re: [PR] RAT-54: Tika based document analyzer [creadur-rat]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
ottlinger commented on PR #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/240#issuecomment-2093681175 > @ottlinger If you approve I can merge this. If you want more eyes on it, lets's invite a few reviewers. In the PR's main description you've created a check list - is that

Re: [PR] RAT-54: Tika based document analyzer [creadur-rat]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
ottlinger commented on code in PR #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/240#discussion_r1589675326 ## src/changes/changes.xml: ## @@ -72,6 +72,22 @@ https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/xsd/changes-1.0.0.xsd --> + +

Re: [PR] RAT-54: Tika based document analyzer [creadur-rat]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
ottlinger commented on code in PR #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/240#discussion_r1589675326 ## src/changes/changes.xml: ## @@ -72,6 +72,22 @@ https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/xsd/changes-1.0.0.xsd --> + +

Re: [PR] RAT-54: Tika based document analyzer [creadur-rat]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
ottlinger commented on code in PR #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/240#discussion_r1589673093 ## apache-rat-core/src/test/java/org/apache/rat/document/impl/guesser/BinaryGuesserTest.java: ## @@ -1,150 +1,150 @@ -/* - * Licensed to the Apache Software

Re: [PR] RAT-54: Tika based document analyzer [creadur-rat]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
ottlinger commented on code in PR #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/240#discussion_r1589669854 ## apache-rat-core/pom.xml: ## @@ -126,5 +126,10 @@ assertj-core test + Review Comment: Thanks. -- This is an automated message

Re: [RAT][DISCUSS] Process Archive Files

2024-05-03 Thread P. Ottlinger
Cool, good to know that everything works automatically! Phil Am 03.05.24 um 12:59 schrieb Claude Warren: If the XML looks like: " The output as defined in the default.xslt would be: A src/test/resources/elements/dummy.jar MIT MITThe MIT License AL

Re: [RAT][DISCUSS] Process Archive Files

2024-05-03 Thread Claude Warren
If the XML looks like: " The output as defined in the default.xslt would be: A src/test/resources/elements/dummy.jar MIT MITThe MIT License AL AL Apache License Version 2.0 So all the enclosed licenses are reported for the jar itself. If

Re: [RAT][DISCUSS] Process Archive Files

2024-05-03 Thread P. Ottlinger
Hi Claude, Am 03.05.24 um 07:26 schrieb Claude Warren: " This proposal would, in cases where licenses are discovered, add the license entries as with STANDARD resource types. For example: " how would the report on System.out look like? a) "exploded" A Foo.jar GPL3