[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17806386#comment-17806386 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - See

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17806270#comment-17806270 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - Perfect, [~solomax] , thank you! > Performance degradation

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17806002#comment-17806002 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - [~solomax] Can you give a procedure for reproducing this, please?

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17805031#comment-17805031 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - Could we, please, have a clear distinction between the following

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-325) Performance degradation compared to 0.15

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17804888#comment-17804888 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325: - [~jbonofre] In your comment from 30/Oct/2023, you unfortunately

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-337) Apache RAT - GitHub Action

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17794224#comment-17794224 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-337: - I have no real experience with GitHub actions, so bear with me,

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-315) RAT build fails with most current Maven 4-alpha3 build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17746577#comment-17746577 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-315: - Quoting [~pottlinger] : [~joc...@apache.org] the merge changed

[jira] [Created] (RAT-316) Add MANIFEST.MF to the default exclude list.

Jochen Wiedmann created RAT-316: --- Summary: Add MANIFEST.MF to the default exclude list. Key: RAT-316 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-316 Project: Apache Rat Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-302) Site build does not work with JDK18

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17550882#comment-17550882 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-302: - Hi, Philip,   as this appears to be a JDK issue, and JDK 18 is

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-283) Unify Java 8 requirement or non-requirement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17518215#comment-17518215 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-283: - I think, this has been resolved with RAT-274.   > Unify Java 8

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-288) Remove -debug hint in log messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17518210#comment-17518210 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-288: - Hi, Philip,   I'm fine with accepting the patch, as it is.  

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17517289#comment-17517289 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - Well, all I can say is: Reading your comment, I understand that

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17516319#comment-17516319 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - [~pottlinger] From the history, it is not obvious to me, why you

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-273. - Fix Version/s: 0.14 Resolution: Fixed Build for Java 16, and Java 17 is still failing, but

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17515591#comment-17515591 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - Reviewing the usage of java.io.LineNumberReader, I found that

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17515534#comment-17515534 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: -   See

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-273) Build failures with >=JDK16 - analyze test behaviour or rewrite tests and update build matrix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17515527#comment-17515527 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-273: - So far, I can't provide a fix, but I believe to have found the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-275) Update httpclient to fix CVE-2020-13956 once a new doxia-core release is available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464515#comment-17464515 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-275: - Excuse me? What's going on here? AFAIK, Rat doesn't use Doxia, or

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-288) Remove -debug hint in log messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17397235#comment-17397235 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-288: - If I get that correctly, then we should use the Maven version,

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-236) cannot find "org/apache/rat/unapproved-licenses.xsl";

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-236. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Reporter didn't respond in close to four years: Closing.   > cannot

[jira] [Closed] (RAT-236) cannot find "org/apache/rat/unapproved-licenses.xsl";

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann closed RAT-236. --- > cannot find "org/apache/rat/unapproved-licenses.xsl"; >

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-283) Unify Java 8 requirement or non-requirement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17381594#comment-17381594 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-283: -   Excuse me? This is "Critical"?   Well, I see no reason for

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-199) Support for m2e in Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17012631#comment-17012631 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-199: - Thanks, [~slachiewicz], but it would be good to have some sort of

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-251) Support for SPDX identifiers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801915#comment-16801915 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-251: - Okay. As of this writing, we are not identifying a particular

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-251) Support for SPDX identifiers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801690#comment-16801690 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-251: - What do you have in mind? I really don't understand your desire?

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-251) Support for SPDX identifiers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801639#comment-16801639 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-251: - Please define "understand".   > Support for SPDX identifiers >

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-249) Show list of files with unapproved licenses in console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16517936#comment-16517936 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-249: - If I understand correctly, you are using the Maven Plugin. The

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-239) rat plugin fails in mult-iproject build when subproject has surefire-plugin forkCount=0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16192626#comment-16192626 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-239: - First of all, thanks for the excellent instructions on how to

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-220) JDK version 1.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15481510#comment-15481510 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-220: - Well, what is the paint point? Who's bothered, right now? > JDK

[jira] [Assigned] (RAT-220) JDK version 1.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann reassigned RAT-220: --- Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann > JDK version 1.6 > --- > > Key: RAT-220

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-58) Create API module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-58. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann Fix Version/s: 0.12 > Create API module >

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-216) Update versions in pom after release of 0.12 and update dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15430253#comment-15430253 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-216: - Please clarify that statement: We are unable to update to the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-163) Gradle Rat plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935143#comment-14935143 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-163: - Regarding "Building with JDK 5", please note the following: If the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-208) Add support for exclude files to maven plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14935342#comment-14935342 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-208: - @[~tillw]: I've called for a release on dev@creadur. > Add

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-163) Gradle Rat plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14909763#comment-14909763 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-163: - [~eskatos] Would you be able to provide a patch, that removes the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-60) Create Crawler Module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14548091#comment-14548091 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-60: Robert: What do you mean by Crawler Module? Create

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-160) Fails to ignore build.log created by maven-invoker-plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14487159#comment-14487159 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-160: - @[~khmarbaise]: That's certainly not the issue.

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-199) Support for m2e in Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384466#comment-14384466 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-199: - What do you expect? An M2E connector that advises

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-199) Support for m2e in Eclipse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384490#comment-14384490 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-199: - As I guessed, you'd like to see a connector.

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-198) Upgrade plexus-utils to 3.0.20

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381764#comment-14381764 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-198: - Then: What are the advantages (if any) of the

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-198) Upgrade plexus-utils to 3.0.20

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381466#comment-14381466 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-198: - Is this related to RAT-197 (see my comment in that

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-197) Exclude the new .mvn/ folder from rat checked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14379988#comment-14379988 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-197: - The best way to do this will most likely be to

[jira] [Closed] (RAT-189) Excludes should support ** style paths

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann closed RAT-189. --- Excludes should support ** style paths -- Key:

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-189) Excludes should support ** style paths

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-189. - Resolution: Invalid Assignee: Jochen Wiedmann Excludes should support ** style paths

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-189) Excludes should support ** style paths

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14275717#comment-14275717 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-189: - IMO, this should already be the case for the Maven

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-103) Proposal: automatic code formatting based on an example eclipse formater with maven-java-formatter-plugin performed by mvn before each compilation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196628#comment-14196628 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-103: - I also agree with the previous comment. IMO, RAT

[jira] [Resolved] (RAT-103) Proposal: automatic code formatting based on an example eclipse formater with maven-java-formatter-plugin performed by mvn before each compilation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved RAT-103. - Resolution: Won't Fix Proposal: automatic code formatting based on an example eclipse formater with

[jira] [Closed] (RAT-103) Proposal: automatic code formatting based on an example eclipse formater with maven-java-formatter-plugin performed by mvn before each compilation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jochen Wiedmann closed RAT-103. --- Proposal: automatic code formatting based on an example eclipse formater with maven-java-formatter-plugin

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-170) RAT should use itself during build and site generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14113651#comment-14113651 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-170: - While it would certainly be desirable to fulfill