RE: specificity in selecting EntityMentions when using AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor

2013-11-01 Thread Assur, Ted
140, T191, MTHICD9 233.1] If you want an icd9 code that isn't in the cTakes umls dictionary then you can find it online ... but that won't do you much good wrt cTakes. Sean -Original Message- From: Assur, Ted [mailto:theodore.as...@providence.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 20

3.0 --> 3.1

2013-10-31 Thread Assur, Ted
Hi: Although we're testing a proof of concept with version 3.0 right now, I ran into a couple issues in parsing with the AggregatePlanTextUMLSProcessor. In testing the same processing with 3.1, I see significant improvements in performance and accuracy, but schema changes in the output. Specif

RE: specificity in selecting EntityMentions when using AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor

2013-09-04 Thread Assur, Ted
gt;>> similarly the LookupWindowAnnotator handles them both identically. >>> So that suggests it is a problem with the actual lookup of the >>> tokens in the LookupWindow. >>> >>> That's all I can do for now but maybe someone else who knows more >>>

specificity in selecting EntityMentions when using AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor

2013-09-03 Thread Assur, Ted
I'm trying to understand what would prevent the AggregatePlaintextUMLSProcessor AE from correctly parsing specific problems that are defined in the UMLS version used by cTAKES. For example, CIN (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia) in its general usage is parsed out as UMLS CUI C0206708. CIN co

RE: UMLS login and pw

2013-07-16 Thread Assur, Ted
u are getting? Also, are you running cTAKES behind a proxy? --Pei > -Original Message- > From: Assur, Ted [mailto:theodore.as...@providence.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 1:29 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: UMLS login and pw > > Hello: > > First off, I

UMLS login and pw

2013-07-16 Thread Assur, Ted
Hello: First off, I apologize: I'm a newb to cTakes, and if this question's been asked before on the listserv, I'm new to that, too: I've followed the instructions for installing cTAKES, and can run it just fine without the UMLS Analysis Engine for a test run. I have a valid and current UMLS l