On Friday 29 October 2010 5:33:39 pm Robert J. Liguori wrote:
> Sorry, can't help here... I'm just trying to get up to speed with CXF and
> providing my input as I go along.
>
> Perhaps I should hold back on my input until I am more familiar with the
> framework.
No. Don't worry about that issu
Sorry, can't help here... I'm just trying to get up to speed with CXF and
providing my input as I go along.
Perhaps I should hold back on my input until I am more familiar with the
framework.
Thank you for expressing your concerns,
Robert
--
F
Robert,
I wouldn't want you to get the wrong impression from the comments on
your JIRA related to the top-level POM.
There is a trust issue, and it related to the essential fragility of
maven poms. You've picked the one central location where a change
could do just about maximal damage to the bui
IIRC, about the template, it is good about expanding and not expanding
portions of the URL and query string. This might be interesting for
s where you publish the URI parameters of the href, but not the
format of the href. Then the user just uses something like UriBuilder +
the template exten
Hi
I'd like to start a new discussion with the purpose of trying to figure out
what concrete advantages providing an alternative URI Template
implementation [1] can bring to CXF JAXRS users.
Andy and Bill have agreed that it can be good for generating concrete URIs.
However using it for generati
